Wednesday, December 17, 2014

Face Value Siti Aishah Shaik Ismail challenges DS Rosmah to debates?


Salute you Siti Aishah. We need more brave people like you. So Rosmah... you. Take the challenge.. if you have nothing to hide.. take the challenge... we rakyat waiting to hear some good things that you have done .. other than your cincin and handbag story  “If the doors of perception were cleansed, everything would appear to Rosmah as it is, infinite.

For man has closed himself up, till he sees all things thru’ narrow chinks of his cavern.” What face did one have before one’s parents were born? It’s like asking a sunflower what it was before it was a sunflower, or the wind before it was wind.
Like the experiment quoted above, a true Master never asks to see something that isn’t already there.

Hit me baby one more time: How Najib won by losing ‘Person of the Year’It was hard not to like Najib and to be seduced by Rosmah the hope he held for the fake early childhood education programme,  Malaysia , given her ambitions for shaking up the old order of oligopolies and cronyism. One of the strangest conditions afflicting humans goes by the unwieldy name of prosopagnosia, which is a disorder of perception where a person’s ability to recognise faces is severely impaired — including frequently the ability to recognise one’s own face. Interestingly, the syndrome is not related to memory dysfunction, impaired vision or a learning disability. Also, other aspects of vision such as making out objects remain intact.

Joint recipients of the 2014 Nobel Peace Prize, Indian child rights activist Kailash Satyarthi and Pakistani teenager Malala Yousafzai have brought renewed focus on the plight of children across the world. There’s no denying that millions of children today live in destitute or oppressive conditions, silently suffering economic and social deprivation. An estimated 150 million children worldwide are engaged in child labour, while 2,50,000 are child soldiers. As was the case with Malala, countless children also live in the shadow of terror.
Ketua Srikandi PKR Siti Aishah Shaik Ismail bersama peguamnya di luar Ibu Pejabat Polis Daerah Petaling Jaya, pagi tadi ketika hadir memberi keterangan bagi membantu siasatan mengikut Akta Hasutan. – Gambar The Malaysian Insider oleh Afif Abd Halim, 17 Disember, 2014.
PKR's Srikandi chief Siti Aishah Shaik Ismail has challenged the prime minister's wife and patron of Permata, Rosmah Mansor on her fake focussing on the  issue of children’s empowerment in , to a public debate on Rosmah’s early childcare and learning project.
Against this backdrop, both Satyarthi and Malala advocate a global policy approach centred on the rights and interests of children. This is most pertinent in Malaysia where child rights barely survive on the margins of political discourse. Subjects such as education have not been given the attention they deserve because they don’t fit the parameters of vote-bank politics 
 Debate not the government culture. What more with the RM7000 million allocation. Looks as if Permata is not under MOE so it is an organisation that runs the allocation. Is Rosmah the government too? RM711 million allocation was presented in Budget 2015, Siti, be really careful if Puan Puffy Face accept your debate for she is really capable of putting a spell on you. She has been doing that for decades on her silent and flip/flop husband.be very careful Rosmah has got secret weapon... it is a well known fact, Mr and Mrs PM will not debate because they have got nothing to debate esp pm, upthere is empty... what they have is their powerful secret weapon respectively Permata gets 711 million ringgit. That is obscene. But then again, this is an obscene gov. Expect nothing less.Against this backdrop, both Satyarthi and Malala advocate a global policy approach centred on the rights and interests of children. This is most pertinent in South Asia where child rights barely survive on the margins of political discourse. Subjects such as education have not been given the attention they deserve because they don’t fit the parameters of vote-bank politics (or the military’s interests in Pakistan). Satyarthi has repeatedly asserted that global military spending for a week is enough to educate the world’s children, while Malala has survived Taliban bullets in Pakistan to champion the cause of educating children, especially the girl child. In fact, citing their examples Indian and Pakistani governments should work together to jointly promote the welfare of their children.
condemn the shameless abuse of the Sedition Act 1948 and other oppressive laws silence the voice of dissidents and Prime Minister Dato Seri Najib Tun Razak’s political adversaries.
In these two weeks, despite Najib’s promise to ensure that the Sedition Act will be used fairly, we are certain that it is another false promise.
Firstly we recall the investigation of the Taman Medan Assemblywoman, Haniza Talha. She was investigated under the Sedition Act for merely questioning the large amount of budget allocation for the early childhood education programme, Pusat Anak PERMATA Negara (PERMATA) headed by Prime Minister Dato Seri Najib Tun Razak’s wife Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor .
Once more, we were greeted by the unfortunate news that another one of our own, Srikandi Keadilan Malaysia Chief Pn Siti Aishah binti Shaik Ismail was also brought under the sedition dragnet. Similarly, she was put under investigation for comments made in regards to the PERMATA Project, despite the fact that the comments were in relation to the spending of public funds, which is in line with her duties as a leader of the opposition party.
Siti Aishah was questioned by the police this morning at the PJ station. She has challenged Rosmah to a debate on PERMATA and the effectiveness of its programs.This recent actions by the authorities are alarming. As a opposition leaders, we have a legitimate duty to make sure every single cent of the tax payers’ money is spent for the right purpose. What is so seditious about questioning the budget allocation for PERMATA? Moreover, we condemn the actions of the authorities that consistently criminalize critical speech.
We urge Prime Minister Dato Seri Najib Tun Razak to stop intimidating the oppositions and members of civil society by using threatening investigations and charges under the Sedition Act 1948.
In a progressive democracy, we champion free speech, rational discourse and freedom of information. We openly challenge Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor to debate with us on the PERMATA issue, since we are effectively barred on commenting on this issue. We invite her to justify to large amount of budget allocation for PERMATA and the public has a right to being informed of how their money is being spent.
Finally, we strongly condemn Prime Minister Dato Seri Najib Tun Razak’s sudden U-turn on the issue of abolishing the Sedition Act, and as part of a modern democracy, a leader must hold true to his word.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. Show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.
This popular phrase conveys a very simple truth: social development schemes that rely on doles are inherently unsustainable because they create a sense of entitlement among beneficiaries, leaving them with little incentive to contribute to the success of the scheme.This is especially true in Malaysia
where politicians for years have lured poor voters with free social welfare schemes that have failed to deliver on their promise. Given this background, it is imperative that the Najib government takes an incisive approach towards implementing these welfare schemes aimed at providing employment guarantees, health insurance, food security and subsidised education to weaker sections of our society.Introducing welfare schemes as doles to economically-weak sections will not bring about sustainable development. It is time to be innovative in our approach and introduce a greater sense of stakeholder ownership that negates the present culture of entitled social welfare.an effective tool for the targeted delivery of the welfare services and schemes, especially in tracking spends and outcomes.


No comments: