Thursday, May 13, 2010

Saiful also revealed his ring master is EZAM,ROSMA ,AND HIS FUTURE MOTHER IN LAW BEGUM


Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, who has accused Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim of sodomising him, told the High Court that he did not wash his anus after the incident in order to preserve the evidence.readmore

SO THEY ARE READY WITH THE SHOW THE SAYFOOL STORY THE MALAYSIAN VERSION WATERGATE WHO PUT HIM IN , WHO PUSHED IN MAA MAAMIAH

He said this in response to a question from Anwar's lead counsel Karpal Singh during cross-examination.

Karpal had asked if Saiful had his bath on June 26, 2008 (the day of the alleged incident), to which the latter replied that he had done so in the morning.

Karpal: Did you wash your anus after the incident?

Saiful:
I rinsed it.

Karpal: Why didn't you wash it?

Saiful:
I wanted to keep the evidence.

The lawyer also asked why Saiful did not file a police report on the day of the incident or the next day, to which the complainant said: “I was afraid it would affect my future.”

He however said that when he eventually lodged the police report, it was on his own will.

Earlier, Saiful was also given a copy of a news report which quoted him as telling a press conference that the June 26 incident was the first time he had been sodomised.

This was contrary to his claim in court that it happened several times before. [Read: Saiful says he was sodomised more than once]

READMORE Izzah; ANNWAR is still a threat to Barisan GHANI PATAIL SAYS IS OKAY FOR NAJIB TO ABUSE POWER, WHEN HE SENT THAT SMS,TO MANIPULATE THE SYSTEM


Yesterday, Saiful told the court that he had met Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak (who was then deputy premier) two days before June 26 to relate his ordeal.

When asked by Karpal to verify the facts in the news report, Saiful said there was an error pertaining to the part where he had mentioned that it was the first time he had been sodomised.

“I misinterpreted the question,” he added.

Visit to the condo

RELATED ARTICLE Justice may be delayed, but it can never be denied, deep down people despair at what is happening in their country


In the afternoon, the court visited the scene of the incident for an in-camera proceeding where Saiful is learnt to have described the alleged sodomy.

Anwar, 63, is charged with sodomising Saiful, his former aide, at Unit 11-5-1 of the Desa Damansara Condominium, Jalan Setiakasih, Bukit Damansara, between 3.01pm and
4.30pm.

He is charged under Section 377B of the Penal Code and faces up to 20 years in jail and whipping if convicted. He was first charged in August 2008.

This morning, the court rejected Anwar's request for a stay of his sodomy trial pending his appeal against the dismissal of his application to obtain Saiful's witness statements.

Justice Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah ruled that his decision to dismiss the application for the witness statements yesterday was procedural and could not be appealed.READMORE Sleepy head Abdullah want so much for the police to charge Anwar? Simple: because his Deputy, Najib Tun Razak, would invariably get dragged into this whole mess.


The defence had also failed to show special circumstances for the stay to be granted, he added.

The trial will resume on May 31.

From today's trial:

related article when the governmence effectiveness and rule of law. Voice and accountability,burning burning najib fiddle with sodomy2 directed by rosmah“ can we afford another Anwar prosecution”Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan?

Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan today revealed details of his separate meetings with Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak and former PKR Youth chief Ezam Mohd Nor, who was recently appointed senator.

Saiful told the High Court that Najib, who was then deputy prime minister, was initially sceptical about his allegation against Anwar Ibrahim, but this later turned to shock.

The meeting took place at the deputy premier's residence in Taman Duta on June 24, 2008, two days before the sodomy incident which led Saiful to file a police report against Opposition Leader Anwar.

On June 27, Saiful said he met Ezam in Rawang to complain to the latter about how Anwar had allegedly abused him.

Ezam, a former close confidant of Anwar since his days as deputy premier, had quit PKR after a fallout and since then has been on the warpath against his ex-boss.readmore It takethe evil UMNO TO recognise the evil dickface EZAM ,THE BEDSIDE STORY

Saiful, who was a former aide to the opposition leader, has claimed that he was sodomised by Anwar against his will at a condominium in Kuala Lumpur on June 26.readmore PART 2 how did Ezam become Mahathir’s script writer? Mahathir need Ezam FINISH OFF ANWAR ,MAHATIR FAILED IN HIS Attempted murder

He has also claimed that it was not the first time that the man, whom he idolised, had done this to him.

Anwar, on the other hand, has described the charge as a political consipracy, similar to the one authored in 1998 which saw him jailed for sodomy.readmre part3 EZAM WAS ALWAYS A MAHATHIR’S RECRUIT HIS SENATOR’SHIP APPOINTMENT CONFIRM HOW CLOSE EZAM AND MAHATHIR


Saiful also revealed details pertaining to his phone call to Inspector-General of Police Musa Hassan a day before the incident and his meeting with another top cop Rodhwan Mohd Yusof.

Saiful, on the third day of cross-examination by Anwar's counsel Karpal Singh, said he first went to Najib's office in January 2008 to get a support letter for a study loan to enrol for a pilot course in Kota Baharu.

"At that time, I did not see the deputy prime minister and only met his special officer," he added.

30-minute meeting with Najib

Responding to another question, Saiful, 24, said he was taken to Najib's house on June 24 by the latter's ex-aide Khairil Anas.

“I went to Khairil's house to tell him about this (sodomy allegation), and he then took me to Najib's house,” he said, adding that they reached the latter's residence around 8pm.

Saiful said he then spent some 30 minutes relating his ordeal to the deputy prime minister during the meeting, where Khairil was also present.

Asked if Najib had offered him any advice, the star witness replied: “No”.

Apart from this, Saiful also revealed to the court that he had caught a glimpse of Najib's wife Rosmah Mansor at the house, but did not meet her personally.

He also denied meeting one 'Datuk Mumtaz' at Najib's house.

It is believed that Karpal was referring to Mumtaz Jaafar, a former national runner, who now heads the National Athlete Welfare Foundation, in which Rosmah is the patron. Mumtaz is said to be a close friend of Rosmah.

Quizzed on how he had obtained the IGP's phone number, Saiful said it happened by chance when he was in Najib's house.

“Najib asked for Musa's number from someone whom I cannot identify. I overheard the conversation and keyed the number into my mobile phone in case of emergency,” he added.

After the meeting with Najib, Saiful said Khairil drove him back to the latter's house, and this was where he received a call from Rodhwan, and the police officer had asked Saiful to meet him at Melia Hotel on the same night.

“I met Rodhwan in a room at the hotel and told him what had happened to me,” he said, adding that he had only related his complaint verbally and did not lodge a report then.

'Crank call' to the IGP

Responding to Karpal, Saiful said Rodhwan did not advise him on what to do next, but had requested for another meeting at the Concorde Hotel on June 25. This was later cancelled.

As for Musa, Saiful said he had called the police chief on June 25 and had a brief conversation with him.

Karpal: Why telephone him?

Mohd Saiful: To complain about my problems.

Karpal: Many problems?

Mohd Saiful: Of course, I have many problems.

Karpal: Did you meet him?

Mohd Saiful: Only contacted him.

Karpal: When?

Mohd Saiful: On June 25, 2008, in the morning.

Karpal: You contacted him to tell him your problems, right?

Mohd Saiful: Yes, but I only spoke for a minute and was scolded by the IGP because he probably thought it was a crank call and put down the telephone. He also reminded me not to call him again.

To another question from Karpal, Saiful said he did not find it strange that he had managed to meet the deputy premier and call the IGP.

On his meeting with Ezam, Saiful said a colleague, by the name of Rahimi, and his uncle, Tuah Mohamad, took him to mee Ezam at the latter's house at Bandar Tasik Puteri.

Asked by Karpal if he had known Ezam prior to that, Saiful said he only knew him superficially.

Saiful told the court that the late night meeting with Ezam, prior to the police report being lodged against Anwar, only ended the next morning.

The trial continues tomorrow.

Anwar, 63, is charged with sodomising his former aide Mohd Saiful, 25, at Unit 11-5-1 Desa Damansara Condominium, Jalan Setiakasih, Bukit Damansara, between 3.01pm and 4.30pm on June 26, 2008.

He is charged under Section 377B of the Penal Code and faces up to 20 years' in jail and whipping upon conviction.

The High Court this morning ruled against Anwar Ibrahim's application to obtain Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan's written statement from the prosecution.

Justice Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah also said that there was no contradiction from Mohd Saiful on the sodomy incident allegedly committed by Anwar.

He also ruled that Mohd Saiful had been consistent in his statements and testimonies in court and that it was the Attorney-General's discretion to decide on the charge against a person.

"I agree with Solicitor-General II Mohamed Yusof Zainal Abiden that although Anwar is charged under Section 377B of the Penal Code -- even though Mohd Saiful claimed that the incident was non-consensual -- it cannot be a basis for a hunch to say that the statements contradict his testimonies in court and therefore they should be given to the defence for the purpose of cross-examination or for impeachment," he said.

Mohamad Zabidin said that so far, Mohd Saiful did not contradict his statements.

"Just because the prosecution chose to charge the accused (Anwar) under Section 377B, this does not mean it can be a basis for a hunch which merits the handing over of the statements to the defence," he said.

Mohamad Zabidin cited a case in which the Federal Court had ruled that "there must be some material contradiction or other circumstances unexplained by the witness in first instance before counsel can move to seek to impeach his credit. A mere hunch will not suffice.

"Based on this ground, the application to have the statements supplied to the defence is hereby dismissed," he said.

Following this Anwar's lawyer Karpal Singh applied for a stay of the trial, pending his appeal over the dismissal of the application for Mohd Saiful's written statement. However this was rejected.

Justice Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah, after a brief recess, ruled that the trial should continue and ordered Mohd Saiful to take the stand again for him to be cross-examined by Karpal.

Yesterday Karpal sought the court to order the prosecution to submit Mohd Saiful's written statement after claiming that there were discrepancies over the charges framed and Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan's testimony.

Karpal said that while Anwar was charged with allegedly committing consensual sex with Mohd Saiful, the witness had said that it was not consensual.

Solicitor-General II Mohamed Yusof Zainal Abidin, who led the prosecution team, had replied that it was the discretion of the Attorney-General, as the prosecutor, to charge any person under any section.
That you did, but I disagree with your title. Justice is not an illusion. There are some who confuse justice with perception or perspective, but justice is not an illusion and those of us who are brutally honest do note it when not choosing (and it is a choice) to be blinded by self interest. No justice is very real, just in very short supply. And I for one believe that Justice Ariff did and does dispense justice.

The malaysian governtment did the unthinkable, Augustine PauL Federal Court judge GOT THIS POSITION TRU corruption



Charge Najib,Ezam,Rosmah, charge them for abetting SAIFUL for making a false report and causing all the trouble.Send them to jail

S. AUGUSTINE PAUL

S. Augustine PaulS. Augustine Paul
justice is subjective. If I recall my Political Science class “US Legal System” years ago, only 10 percent of cases go to trial. The rest 90 percent result in plea bargain, this is because lawyers ( gatekeepers to law system) are expensive.
Miranda Warning, which read to suspects being detained by law officers
“ …The person in custody must, prior to interrogation, be clearly informed that he or she has the right to remain silent, and that anything the person says may be used against that person in court; the person must be clearly informed that he or she has the right to consult with an attorney and to have that attorney present during questioning, and that, if he or she is indigent, an attorney will be provided at no cost to represent him or her. ”readmore
related articles click belw to readmre

Frivolous Can Najib dismisses Bala’s claims on his SMS to SHAFEE ABDULLAH FIXING judge to buttress the evidence.: FIXING BAGINDA’S FREEDOM

ecember 17, 2009

RECYCLE Deja vu in sodomy charge ASSHOLE LESLIE LAU IF YOU HAVE GONE THRU WHAT ANWAR WENT THRU YOU WILL BE SELLING YOUR ASSHOLE WHOLESELL



One smart asshole RAZAK BAGINDA is Intriguing and interestingHAS WAIT FOR THE A.G OFFICE prosecution NOT follow thru with an appeal BEFOREHIS FIRST MEET PRESS? WHAT WAS HIS MESSAGE TO THE MALAYSIANS WHO ARE THE SUCKERS

Have you read the Unholy Trinity Have you read the Unholy Trinity


Augustine Paul THE HELL FIRE WILL EAT DAILY YOUR WARIS WILL BE SELLING THEIR ASSHOLE FOR LIVING THIS IS THE CURSE OF GOOD PEOPLE OF MALAYSI


NAJIB SAID Musa to stay on as IGP, fixed up Anwar on the sodomy we need corrupted musa to fightcorruption a technical and element of subjectivity matter


Supreme Court judges do not seem to comply with internationally accepted standards for managing conflict of interest in cases

No comments: