Kamalanathan is a gay. ‘The pariah caste’ is the BN candidate standing in the Hulu Selangor

hai KJ YOURS IS INTACT NO PENETRATION YET SAYS

KAMALANATHAN , THE GUY WANTS K.J FOR HIMSELF

Received this in the email from an anonymous source. Even if it is true I just wish them good luck. The authorities still fail to see the honor in a fair fight. Never mind, bring in your imported cyber-troopers and thereby insulting your local-bred troopers who you have already by this action, labeled as impotent! Not nice lah to call your people useless, hai KJ YOURS IS INTACT NO PENETRATION YET SAYS KAMALANATHAN , THE GUY WANTS K.J FOR HIMSELF

When announcing BN's candidacy in the Hulu Selangor by-election, coalition deputy chairperson Muhyiddin Yasin said that their candidate, P Kamalanathan, is a man without baggage. He added that this was unlike PKR candidate Zaid Ibrahim who has a chequered track record, and skeletons in the closet, which Muhyiddin promised to expose.readmore

this Taxidriver’s sources the true story Muhyiddin Yassin call at 2pm Mugilan we need you badly to fixup Zaid,the PM needs you. We hope you help us and we will not forget you’.

this Taxidriver’s sources the story‘Muhyiddin Yassin call at 2pm Mugilan we need you badly to fixup Zaid,the PM needs you. We hope you help us and we will not forget you’.

“I have no issues with Kamalanathan,” Voters of Hulu Selangor, you have been blessed with a true gentleman to be elected as your Member of Parliament. I am referring to Datuk Zaid Ibrahim, a real sincere highly principled gentleman who cares for the people whatever class, colour or creed! It is time for PR to kick some asses!he said, pointing out that he, like Palanivel, had no qualms in helping the former in his campaign.

P. Kamalanathan‘The pariah caste’ is the BN candidate standing in the Hulu Selangor by-election. In his interview with Malaysiakini, he was quoted as saying: “Perkasa has its own role. It is strengthening its (Malay) race, its language and its religion, and we (MIC) are also doing the same by strengthening our race, religion and language.”

Kamalanathan – known as Kamal (why not Nathan?) – was also quoted as saying that Perkasa’s role is about “empowering” the Malay race and it does not trample on the rights of other races.

It is pertinent that his statement should be viewed in juxtaposition with what Perkasa patron Dr Mahathir Mohamad said Friday at the commemoration of Mara’s 44th anniversary.

Responding to reporters’ questions after his keynote address, Mahathir said he sees no time frame for putting a stop to the NEP and that the other communities did not lose much when the policy was introduced in the 1970s.

Mahathir is saying that all the advantages and opportunities being given to Malays under NEP is not robbing Peter to pay Paul. His view is not much different in its syllogism from Kamal’s that Perkasa does not seek to impinge on the rights of others.

‘The pariah caste’

Despite what Kamal may say, the truth is that MIC has miserably failed the Indians. When the Tamil underclass is so poor, in what way can that be construed as the race having been enfranchised?

Indians are strong men and women; it is Malaysia’s apartheid that has weakened them over decades of discrimination. Comparatively, those of the diaspora in the advanced countries have done well for themselves.

Given the Ketuanan Melayu agenda of denial, it is not surprising that Najib Razak’s erstwhile aide Nasir Safar should have commented that the Indian forefathers come here as “beggars”. It elevates the Malays to put down the calibre of the ‘pendatang’. No surprise either that Perkasa should be the first to rally to Nasir’s defence and urge that he be given a chance to explain the context of his remarks.

Also, contrary to the opinion “pergilah kau tertindas”/”what rubbish to say that you’re oppressed” by former Perlis mufti Dr Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin when commenting on the Hindraf demonstration – the truth is, Indians are.

Asri’s views are quite typical of Malay prejudice: “Sangat hina kehidupan mereka di dalam negeri mereka. Kasta pariah ini telah dibawa oleh Inggeris ke dalam negara kita … kehidupan yang mereka nikmati di sini seribu kali ganda lebih baik daripada … negara merempat, naik bas, tak pakai baju, tak pakai seluar.”

Translation: “They led an abject life in their country (India). This pariah caste were brought to our country by the English … the life they enjoy here is a thousand times better than in … that suffering country where (people) board the bus not wearing shirt, not wearing pants.”

This truth is that today, Tamil Nadu – where our Indians mostly originated from – possesses the third largest economy (year 2007-2008) among the states in India, and experienced a double-digit GDP growth rate of 12.1 per cent during this period. It is the most industrialized state in India and ranked third for attracting FDI.

Chennai (formerly known as Madras and the capital of Tamil Nadu) houses India’s largest IT park; this IT hub was ranked “the top metropolitan city to invest in Asia Pacific”. Tamil Nadu was ranked 9th region to invest in 2008, and is India’s leading software exporter.

Malaysian Indians would likely be better off if their ancestors had not emigrated here.

Mara shuts out others

As part of the BN election goodie bag, Kamal said “the prime minister and the deputy prime minister have made a decision to build a UiTM” in Hulu Selangor.

Although the establishment of Mara in 1966 predates the NEP which began in 1970, this federal agency is nonetheless a major provider of Malay privileges. Mara administers the Mara Junior Science Colleges, Mara Colleges, Giatmara, Mara Skills Training Institutes, Mara Higher Skills Training Institutes, Mara Infotech Institutes and Mara Professional Colleges.

Mara also offers scholarships and sponsorships, including for students abroad and up to PhD level or doing medicine, as well as loans for entrepreneurs. The reality is that these Mara entities are all over the country and its reach widespread; UiTM is the largest university in Malaysia.

To run all of the above, Mara is allocated tremendous funding each year.

Compared to Mara’s largesse, Kamal’s rhetoric – “Is it wrong for me to want to memperkasakan Tamil schools?” – rings extremely hollow, especially in light of the dilapidated estate schools.

He misses the irony of dangling the UiTM carrot when Mara has an almost single-race enrolment.

How many Muslim converts?

As to Kamal’s ingenuous contention that the pursuit of Malay supremacy does not trample on the religious rights of other races, I would argue otherwise. Not only does it trample, after stomping there’s spitting too for good measure – as the Shah Alam cow-head episode discerned.

MIC’s claim that it has strengthened Indians in their religion should be put to the test with a challenge to reveal the number of Indians who have converted to Islam.

From anecdotal evidence, they have been converted in droves and the side-effects coming to public attention in the form of the bodysnatching and child custody cases teetering between jurisdictions of the syariah and civil courts.

Among the plentiful fresh converts, you see women in their badly tied tudung whose hair has barely shed the scent of jasmine.

Ponder on this: An apple doesn’t call itself a ‘non-orange’. One of reasons why the non-Malays convert (then at least they wouldn’t be non-Muslims) could be to eliminate one half of the two-pronged negation occasioned by diminishment when one is officially a ‘non’.

Mandores to Umno

Kamal, who is MIC information chief, has a professional background in public relations. Judging from the scorn still poured on Indian ethnicity, it’s evident that their image problem has not been rectified. Kamal has done a poor job for MIC’s Indian publicity.

The lowly position of the Indian is even reflected in differentiated word use. A search through Utusan’s archives reveals a general pattern on the word ‘jenazah’ to refer to Muslim, and ‘mayat’ for non-Muslim corpses, e.g. “menuntut mayat Prema a/p Elenchelian” but “menuntut jenazah Abdul Muiz Mokhtar”.

Language when referring to bereaved families is also different: “mengucapkan takziah kepada keluarga Allahyarham Edi Rizal Ramli” but “seorang ahli keluarga si mati” Kugan Ananthan.

And only last week, on April 8, brothers si mati R Satchithantham and R Logeswaran were killed by police in Taiping. Their mayat were riddled with bullets.

Indians are clearly the object of police profiling. They make up 95 per cent of victims shot dead by Polis Diraja Malaysia when only 8 per cent of the Malaysian population, according to an estimate by the Human Rights Party for year 2009 to present.

Yet Perkasa president Ibrahim Ali infamously refutes the contention that ethnic minorities are second class citizens. “Don’t talk shit, you see don’t talk shit. I, I, I repeat don’t talk shit,” he said in his much-viewed Al-Jazeera interview.

Perkasa is playing a zero sum game. Its approach to strengthening Malays is in direct proportion to the suppression of non-Malays.

Kamal’s defence of this ultra movement is untenable but not unexpected as after all, this is a candidate who said that he would “take back the federal seat and deliver it to Prime Minister Najib Razak as gift for his first year in office.”

Like a housecat dragging in an offering of a captured mouse. — Centre for Policy Initiatives

(english.cpiasia.net)

It would seem hypocrisy is an official state policy in Malaysia. Here is Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Husseinenjoying a few cold Anchor beer with a few ladies in his younger playboy days. These pictures have been around for some time now but it is an appropriate time to share them again in light of his recent decision to have a woman suffer from six from a cane. Hishammuddin Hussein was never caned for drinking beer because certain people in Malaysia can getaway with murderwhile people like Kartika are treated like dogs for the most minor infractions. Yup, she is going to be punished for the same crime the Home Minister himself is no stranger to. The woman officer should have demonstrated the caning on him for his past infractions of the laws he is enforcing now. Hopefully the western media with pick up on this bit of hypocrisy.Click pictures to enlarge.

this is not a Doctored pictures real picture see the differance

The dirty tricks and slandering has started. Doctored pictures of Zaid ‘drinking’ are being circulated and published in the pro-Umno Blogs to ‘prove’ that the Pakatan Rakyat candidate has ‘baggage’ while the pro-opposition Blogs are carrying stories about the MIC candidate Kamalanathan being gay.

This is supposedly one of his mistresses, the air stewardess that was caught having an affair with him in Johor Bahru. And she is said to be the same lady that he took to Mongolia on a trip with the then PM.

Booze and ladies, all you need in life.

Here is his wife not to be confuse with his mistress enjoying a cold one too. She look totally wasted but she seem to be hotter than his mistress.

Here is the hypocrite minister when he is not getting wasted:

Click on pictures to enlarge.

Zaid may drown in liquor allegations

When announcing BN's candidacy in the Hulu Selangor by-election, coalition deputy chairperson Muhyiddin Yasin said that their candidate, P Kamalanathan, is a man without baggage. He added that this was unlike PKR candidate Zaid Ibrahim who has a chequered track record, and skeletons in the closet, which Muhyiddin promised to expose.

Top of the list of attacks are allegations that Zaid consumes alcohol, which is forbidden in Islam and undermines his identity as a Muslim and a 'man of principle'. As evidence, moments before the nomination process began Kuala Kubu Baru was hit with posters of a doctored image of Zaid with what appeared to be an alcoholic drink. -- Malaysiakini

*************************************************

The dirty tricks and slandering has started. Doctored pictures of Zaid ‘drinking’ are being circulated and published in the pro-Umno Blogs to ‘prove’ that the Pakatan Rakyat candidate has ‘baggage’ while the pro-opposition Blogs are carrying stories about the MIC candidate Kamalanathan being gay.

So what if Kamalanathan is gay? This should not be an issue that is used against him. Ahmad Ismail of Penang is gay as well but I have never used this as an issue against him. I whack him for calling Chinese and Indians pendatang and for tearing up the Gerakan ex-Penang Chief Minister’s photograph. But I never whacked him for being gay.

A person may be gay. Well, that is not his or her fault. Most people who are gay can’t help themselves. They were born that way. But this does not mean they are immoral. Most gay people are faithful to their partners and do not sleep around whilst non-gay people can be very promiscuous and change sex partners ever so often. In that sense gay people are not sexually immoral.

Anyway, who cares what you do in the privacy of your bedroom? The pro-opposition Blogs should not raise the issue of the MIC candidate being gay as the ammunition to attack him. Does he sleep around? That is what should be more important than the issue of him being gay.

Zaid, in turn, is being whacked for his alleged ‘drinking habit’. Okay, let us say he does. So he drinks. So what? Does he buy his drinks using the taxpayers’ money? Does he rob the rakyat to support his drinking habit? Is his liquor being bought using our money? Or does he indulge with his own money and not the money he stole from us?

So you see, even if he does drink, and I am not saying he does, does he hurt any of us or only himself?

The Barisan Nasional people may claim they do not drink. Actually, many do, even Umno people. And they also rob the rakyat, steal from the nation, take bribes, misuse the taxpayers’ money, etc. So they are drinking with our money, not with their own money.

Actually, I don’t care a damn if a person drinks (or indulges in same sex relationships) as long as they do all this with their own money. But when you steal my money to indulge (even if you do not drink but just use the money to take your wife to London and Paris to shop) then I will make an issue out of it.

Let us be very clear as to what constitutes a ‘crime’. What you do in your own time and with your own money is your concern. What you do with my money is my concern. And the Barisan Nasional people use our money to do what they do even if they don’t drink.

I know they are raising the issue of liquor to shock the Malay voters, who represent more than half the voters in Hulu Selangor. If that is the only ‘baggage’ they can find to use against Zaid then this means they have very little to use against him. First of all, they have been caught using doctored photographs to support this allegation. This means they are not able to find evidence to support this allegation and are desperately fabricating the evidence.

Let us get way from the personal attacks and so-called baggage. Both Barisan Nasional and Pakatan Rakyat need to talk about the mission and vision. We want to know how they plan to run the country. We want to know how they have run the country thus far.

Umno, MCA and MIC ran Selangor for 51 years. Over the last two years Selangor was run by Pakatan Rakyat. Can we compare 51 years of Barisan Nasional rule to two years of Pakatan Rakyat rule? Have we seen a better-run Selangor over the last two years with Pakatan Rakyat at the helm compared to 51 years of Barisan Nasional?

What more is Pakatan Rakyat going to do for Selangor in general and Hulu Selangor in particular? Would the people get a better deal with Pakatan Rakyat at the helm?

The Orang Asli in Selangor are unhappy and there are many Orang Asli in Hulu Selangor. Are they now happier since Pakatan Rakyat has been in charge the last two years? Is there more that they hope to see, which Pakatan Rakyat has not done yet and which needs to be done?

The same goes for the Chinese and Indians. In 51 years of Barisan Nasional rule there was much that they had hoped for but their appeals fell on deaf ears. Has all this changed over the last two years since March 2008 or has Pakatan Rakyat proved to be the same as Barisan Nasional? Has the change of government brought no changes to the state and has Pakatan Rakyat been as deaf as Barisan Nasional? Or have things changed drastically the last two years since Pakatan Rakyat took over?

No, who drinks and who is gay is not the issue. We are more concerned with the mission and vision of these leaders. Even if they don’t drink and are not gay, but if they rob our state, they abuse their positions, they misuse our money, they short-change the voters, they steal from the taxpayers, they line their own pockets, and whatnot, then they need to be rejected.

It is futile to argue about a person’s choice of beverage and sex partners. One side will accuse and the other side will deny. One side must certainly be lying. But let us not waste time arguing about who is telling the truth. We have only a few days to decide whom we want in government. And our choice must be made based on who can best serve the people.

That is how matured voters make their decision and decide on their choice.