Israelgate, Ghost of ALTUNTANYA haunts the MUSA HASSAN the Mattress carrier CONVINCED THAT BODOWI De Facto recognition of ZIONIST STATE ISREAL

The scope of the Attorney-General’s powers in these institutions, there is still the question of integrity of the key office-holders who helm these institutions – chief justice, attorney general, inspector general of police and director general of ACA. It is often said that one may have the best laws in the world, but if we have crooks to implement them, the good laws may come to nothing.

Well said Mr Kim Quek.

De facto law minister Nazri Aziz ,once said we ministers are comfortable with as it is why should we change? If you want change try at the election .

So that is the reality this what peoples comment --Kim Quek, many thanks for the above article. It explains clearly and I am sure all readers understand its content. The UMNO/BN regime will not make any reform that benefits the rakyat, the reform is only meant to control our lives and our souls. When najib becomes PM, I bet you more dramatic actions of arrogance from the UMNO goons shall be unfolded by the truckloads !

this is what PA LAH said

, Datuk Datuk Seri when you speak of the reforms to these three pillars of justice, you must also address the public’s perception of the Attorney General (A-G)’s Chambers. As it stands, the A-G’s Chambers is viewed as the government’s legal adviser, so when it comes to cases that involve politicians and government personalities, there is the perception that the A-G is biased.

These concerns will be addressed through the reforms to the judiciary and the ACA that will take place.

Sir, if the system does not provide fair prosecution, your whole plan will fail. One good example: When Raja Petra Kamaruddin was released, the A-G’s Chambers appealed, but when Abdul Razak Baginda was acquitted, the A-G decided not to appeal. It is about public perception.

We will see what form of mechanisms to use. We haven’t lost touch with that. As in the anti-corruption initiatives, the senior public prosecutor can decide on the charges.

There was resistance to the setting up of a complaints commission on the police before. Why would those opposed to any sort of reform to enforcement agencies, especially the police be any different now?

I don’t think that anyone is opposed to ‘reform’. But different groups want to be heard, to give their input into the design of the reform. That is why the situation now is very different. The police have been more involved, as well as other enforcement groups. There are many things to be worked out but the important guiding philosophy for me is that the Bill must be workable – it must be acceptable to both the police, the ex-Royal Commissioners as well as other civil society groups. As in all things, this means coming to a workable compromise. It is a difficult process, but it is worthwhile.

When you started off five years ago, we were all supportive of you. What went wrong along the way? Was there opposition to your reforms and plans?

Reforms are not easy. I have tried so, so very hard and it is not easy. I know. I tried with the IPCMC (Independent Police Complaints and MisconductCommission) , see how difficult it was? You can’t just rush in and bulldoze through and have a "I don’t care a damn" attitude.

I wouldn’t call it that but it was not easy to get people on the same page.

But you had 90% of the mandate – not just from Umno, but from the rakyat! People who So there were elements out to sabotage your efforts.?

would normally vote Opposition voted for Barisan Nasional. You could have capitalised on this overwhelming support.

Yes, my dear friend, but my survival is in Umno! If Umno doesn’t want me what can the 90% do? That is the system, unfortunately. This is not like (electing) the president of the United States who is appointed directly by the people (laughs).

Maybe you need to reform Umno first before you reform the agencies.

Ah well …

While giving credit to Pak Lah for at least admitting that our judiciary and anti-corruption efforts are in bad shape, his optimism over the effectiveness of these reform measures is at best naïve, and at worst dishonest and deceiving.

LADIES AND LADIES MAN I DONT GIVE A DAM The latest Bala revelations have constituted a solemn challenge to the integrity and legitimacy of Najib’s premiership, for which he must now solemnly account to the nation.

KRISMUDDIN DID I TOLD YOU TO SACK MUSA HASSAN

HA HA HA COUGHT YOU AND YOUR FATHER-INLAW WITH HIS PANTS DOWN

Ghost of ALTUNTANYA haunts the MUSA HASSAN the Mattress carrier CONVINCED THAT BODOWI De Facto recognition of ZIONIST STATE ISREAL

"in freedom we trust, in freedom we hope, in freedom we will be free..........eventually"

As a matter of national shame

A traitor is a traitor, with or without a uniform.

CONVINCED THAT BODOWI De Facto recognition of ZIONIST STATE ISREAL

Former spokesman for late Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin, Gad Ben-Ari hasjust taken a job at the U.S. lobbying firm Apco Worldwide and will head it2)Bodowi K.J equally guilty of selling out the Country ARE TRAITORS TO RAKYAT AND MALAYSIANS. We have to VOTE THESE TRAITORS OUT,YES DUMP THE TRAITOR GOVT at least by next GE. No wonder they really trying VERY VERY HARD TO SILENT DSAI AND PR . I am very sure these traitos had every reason to be SHITSCARED AND BY ALL MEANS HAD TO CLING ON TO POWER.All those concerned HAD TO PAY FOR THEIR PGood politicians know that a single pompous phrase can reverse trajectory and turn a thundering cannonball into an ominous boomerang.MUSA HASSAN loftily informed buck stopped at the Najib Prime minister's deskif his contract is not renewed. He could not have imagined that within months the taunt would return to haunt him.To the IGP, this is what I have to say . . ., stop trying to implicate whistleblowers such as RPK and Anwar. They are with us, the rakyaat, and we the rakyaat, are with them! You got that! We have already known who you are, your true colors. To us you are a traitor, you have betrayed us and there is nothing you can do to change what you are! A traitor is a traitor, with or without a uniform.

Special Branch gives clearance to Israeli nationals, while the Home Minister insists on cover up of MPC's breach of contract, and APCO's involvement was mentioned prior to contract signing on August 2009

By Abd Rahman

Special Branch gives clearance to Israeli nationals

According to the RPK's expose, the Home Minister mentions that he receives many requests for Israeli nationals to work in the country and states that all Israeli nationals are recruits of Israel's arm forces. The Home Minister however deflects responsibility and insists that requests for Israeli workforce in Malaysia received the support and clearance by PDRM, specifically by the Special Branch.

Is this fiasco proof enough that the Special Branch were negligent, or were there other secret schemes? Should the abhorrent ISA law be invoked on the Head of Special Branch? Much lesser excuses were used against Raja Petra and Teresa Kok, what is the government waiting for?


MPC Breach of contract cover up by Home Minister

Furthermore, according to PDRM, Masterplan Consulting Sdn Bhd (MPC), the contractor chosen for the project, breached its contract by sub-contracting to another company, without the written consent of PDRM. Additionally, MPC made a false declaration in filling in the Official Secrets Act form. Some of the MPC staff were declared as employees, whereas these staff were in actual fact employees of Twiz Technology Sdn Bhd. Instead of being alarmed by this fact, the Home Minister insisted that to lodge a police report will cause shame and erode PDRM's public image, subsequently opening up the possibility of a special commission to investigate the breach and re-igniting the debate on the formation of the IPCMC.

The Home Minister insists that terminating the 3 contracts with PRS deals a great blow to the BN government and Cabinet by loss of confidence of the rakyat towards the government and PDRM who acted as "protector" due to negligence of PDRM through the involvement of Asiasoft(M) Sdn Bhd in the PRS project which was confirmed by the Special Branch to have relationship and interest with Israel.

Should the Home Minister be tried for treason? Why did the Minister protect this company? Who are the beneficiaries? Is the IGP involved?

When the Home Minister requested that the terms of the contract be scrutinized by the police, Dato Mashuri pointed out that the contract were actually prepared by the Home Ministry.

Is the Minister that stupid?


Link between APCO and government cemented prior to 2009

The link between APCO and the government seemed to have been cemented prior to the contract signing between APCO Worldwide and the PM department in August 2009; there appears to be some link between the government and APCO back in 2008. During the meeting, the Home Minister claims he received information that PDRM wants to remove Asiasoft(M) Sdn Bhd from the APCO project without elaborating further.

Why is the project called APCO when APCO denied involvement prior to August 2009? Is Najib aware of this? Why is Khairy defending a RM 2 company called APCO Worldwide Sdn Bhd?