somewhere in IN MALAYSIA: And the dying old pig said to its young breeder, "You have been kind that I am not slaughtered, like all others of my kin, though I know it was because I was carrying a virusB.N1corrupt practices,. I can see that like me you are infected, but you shall be saved, but what you may innocently pass on to others may have variable consequences."
Snort! And the pig fell silent. A VULTURE NAMED MAHATHIR WITH BEST FRIEND LINGAM they say, nibbled on the carcass for a while, and flu away. It took sometime for the young man to come to terms with the event, he fell ill, but recovered. Prophetically, many other people in the town became sickcorrupt practices, some died.
Absurd.
Horrible.
Ø If you have nothing to hide, why hide and create suspicion.
Ø You hide because you fear that disclosure would do more harm than hiding.
Ø The Evidence Act, 1972 says so.
Ø If you are asked to produced something in your possession and you don't produce it on demand, the presumption is that if produced it would go against your interest.
It appears that the Opposition can win in court, but only in Round One!This is a tragic situation because it gives the impression that judgments are farcical and on the whole totally unacceptable. When people lose their faith in the judiciary, then the courts no longer stand a as a bastion for justice.In Anwar’s case, the High Court in respecting natural justice and recognising the amendment to Section 51A, ordered the prosecution “to allow Anwar’s lawyers to inspect CCTV recordings of the alleged crime scene, along with witness statement of the alleged victim, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan and that of other witnesses as well as doctors’ notes.”
The High Court also ordered the “medical reports on Mohd Saiful from two hospitals – Hospital Kuala Lumpur and Pusrawi Hospital – and other evidence favourable to the defence to be handed over to Anwar.”
This is a very fair judgment considering the fact that this information sought would eventually be made available to the defence during the trial.
If that is the case, and when the amendment to Section 51A allows this, what is the justification in disallowing this vital information to the defence at this stage?
When a person is charged and his freedom is at stake, he deserves to be given every opportunity to prove his innocence.
However, the Court of Appeal had overlooked this very important principle, giving the impression that the court is not concerned with justice and hardly looks at the substantive issues which deserve their critical attention.
Ø When Judge after Judge is found indulging in corrupt practices, amassing wealth, how could we go with your line of reasoning?
Ø There is also blackmailing going on. This particular Judge from Punjab & Haryana High Court who is allegedly being given a clean chit, had threatened that she alone is not involved and if persecuted she would expose all names. Is it not blackmailing?
Ø In my humble opinion, JUDICIARY IS THE CESSPOOL OF CORRUPTION IN THE COUNTRY. IT IS THE FOUNTAINHEAD.
Ø Least educated or qualified people occupy the highest position in judiciary. I am sorry to say that many of Judges do not have basic knowledge of English to read, understand and interpret law.
Ø What we need is a common code of conduct for all public servants, be it bureaucracy, members of legislatures, elected representative, constitutional appointees, and Judges. They must declare their assets every year, criminal record, if any, so on and so forth.
Ø And lastly pardon my saying this, what about Journalists, Newspapers & Electronic Media. You are wise enough to appreciate what I mean. We cannot wait for another sixty years for freedom; it should come to us now, and we would get it.
Ø I have not said anything worse that what you have said for Prashant Bhushan. My views must be published without moderation.
read this exclusive full story story posted by the taxi driver
No comments:
Post a Comment