The equally contentious issue of whether or not a temple predated the Babri Masjid was referred to the Supreme Court after the 1992 demolition. In 1994, the apex court returned the reference under Article 143 “unanswered”. Was the court signalling its inability to settle a dispute that, ideally, needs a social and political resolution?
The equally contentious issue of whether or not a temple predated the Babri Masjid was referred to the Supreme Court after the 1992 demolition. In 1994, the apex court returned the reference under Article 143 “unanswered”. Was the court signalling its inability to settle a dispute that, ideally, needs a social and political resolution?
However, it was not merely religiosity and exasperation with the judicial process that catapulted a local dispute in Ayodhya into a signature tune of turbulence. The Ayodhya movement encapsulated a larger disquiet over the state of India. The proposed temple symbolised a churning over the meaning of national identity and, at a more subliminal level, the relationship between history and historical memory. The movement generated intellectual debates of a kind that India hasn’t experienced since. To reduce the ferment of that decade to selective images of boisterous sadhus and unruly kar sevaks would be an act of arrogant condescension.
You, Guan Eng have come with endless tales of intended sinuous perception with a mixture of fact and fiction in a piecemeal manner to appease everyone else except those desperate residents of Kg Buah Pala.
Your perception through your network of media and aides have portrayed everything that is against what is the truth for a just and fair cause that lies beneath the surface that is yet to be unfolded although it has been within your control for the last 15 months.
Let me give you several examples, first you said the rule of law, then you said that the previous government is to be blame, then you say that the developer’s had offered $200,000 to the residents, moving on subsequently that it is too costly for the state to acquire on an estimated cost of 30- 200 million and now you say that the state government will pay the compensation and claim it from the federal government.
What is wrong with you Guan Eng, have you lost your nerve, as everything you keep saying being contradicted one way or rather for your inaction with the hope that the public will sympathize with you and you can be in control at least in Penang. Welcome to the world of politics.
The equally contentious issue of whether or not a temple predated the Babri Masjid was referred to the Supreme Court after the 1992 demolition. In 1994, the apex court returned the reference under Article 143 “unanswered”. Was the court signalling its inability to settle a dispute that, ideally, needs a social and political resolution?
However, it was not merely religiosity and exasperation with the judicial process that catapulted a local dispute in Ayodhya into a signature tune of turbulence. The Ayodhya movement encapsulated a larger disquiet over the state of India. The proposed temple symbolised a churning over the meaning of national identity and, at a more subliminal level, the relationship between history and historical memory. The movement generated intellectual debates of a kind that India hasn’t experienced since. To reduce the ferment of that decade to selective images of boisterous sadhus and unruly kar sevaks would be an act of arrogant condescension.
You, Guan Eng have come with endless tales of intended sinuous perception with a mixture of fact and fiction in a piecemeal manner to appease everyone else except those desperate residents of Kg Buah Pala.
Your perception through your network of media and aides have portrayed everything that is against what is the truth for a just and fair cause that lies beneath the surface that is yet to be unfolded although it has been within your control for the last 15 months.
Let me give you several examples, first you said the rule of law, then you said that the previous government is to be blame, then you say that the developer’s had offered $200,000 to the residents, moving on subsequently that it is too costly for the state to acquire on an estimated cost of 30- 200 million and now you say that the state government will pay the compensation and claim it from the federal government.
What is wrong with you Guan Eng, have you lost your nerve, as everything you keep saying being contradicted one way or rather for your inaction with the hope that the public will sympathize with you and you can be in control at least in Penang. Welcome to the world of politics.
When asked about the impact of the French Revolution, Mao Zedong is said to have quipped: “It’s too soon to tell.” In missing the deadline for
| readmore clichere Guan Eng,YOU KNOCK YOUR HEAD AGAINST THE WALL FOR MALAY RAPED VICTIM, NOW WITH POWER BUT SCHOOLBOY MENTALITY,SO GET RID OF YOUR CHIEF OF STAFF |
No comments:
Post a Comment