(The Star) - The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) said its visits to the offices of Selangor state assemblymen were to ascertain if allegations into misuse of constituency development allocations were true.
MACC director of investigations Datuk Mohd Shukri Abdull said the visits were made following allegations that payments had been made even before projects had started.
“We visited the offices of four state assemblymen over the past 48 hours. We are just doing our job to ascertain if there is any truth to the allegations of misuse of allocations by anyone regardless of who they are.
“It does not necessarily mean that the person whom we have visited is a target. It can be someone else,” he said, adding that they had also investigated other political parties before.
Mohd Shukri said the MACC was not targeting the Opposition and questioned how people had come to that conclusion.
He said it was not a MACC practice to announce who was being investigated or the person it intended to investigate.
“If we do that, then they will destroy all the evidence and we will not have a case against those involved in corrupt practices.”
Gobind Singh Deo
The MACC should tell us who the complainants are in respect of the investigations against the Selangor Pakatan Assemblymen.
It is certainly strange that all of a sudden the MACC is investigating not one or two but 12 Pakatan Assemblymen in one go. Was there a general blanket report which was made which covers all Pakatan leaders only? How else would the MACC explain the position?
The MACC exists to combat corruption. It is a public body and it must be accountable to the public. There have been numerous reports made against certain BN leaders but we don’t see any enthusiasm on part of the MACC to bring these people to book.
The MACC must not and cannot abuse its power. It cannot launch blanket investigations against groups of people. As I understand it, as is the case in other criminal investigations, a report must be lodged before investigations may commence. But reports are almost always directed at certain factual patterns implicating certain individuals they cannot be general reports ‘just so that MACC officials may knock on anyone’s door to check’.
The DAP will through its National Legal Bureau write to the MACC for a copy of the report lodged. We will investigate the bona fides of this ‘investigation’. If there is any wrong revealed, we will not hesitate to sue to put things right.
More proof demand: Ruling in favour of defence S Pathmawathy | Jul 16, 09 12:28pm - BREAKING NEWS Justice Mohamad Zabidin Mohd Diah has ordered the prosecution to allow Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim's defence team to inspect CCTV recordings of the alleged crime scene if the copy given is unclear.”The risk for the government is that if Anwar is convicted again, it could greatly strengthen the opposition by making him a political martyr,” said Oei Kee Beng at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies in Singapore.
By John Burton in Singapore, Financial Times
The sodomy trial of Anwar Ibrahim, the Malaysian opposition leader, began on Wednesday but the proceedings could prove to be a double-edged sword for Najib Razak, the prime minister.
Mr Anwar’s aides claim the trial is an attempt by the government to derail a resurgent opposition by imprisoning its charismatic leader. He faces a maximum jail term of 20 years if convicted.
Mr Anwar was previously found guilty of sodomy in 1998 and spent six years in jail on that and corruption charges but an appeals court later overturned the sodomy verdict. Mr Anwar has denied the previous and current charges.
”The risk for the government is that if Anwar is convicted again, it could greatly strengthen the opposition by making him a political martyr,” said Oei Kee Beng at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies in Singapore.
A public protest if Mr Anwar is convicted could undermine a recent surge of support for Mr Najib since he announced economic reforms and other popular measures, including a cut in road toll rates. The prime minister’s approval ratings have climbed to 65 per cent from 46 per cent in mid-May.
In a sign of renewed support for the government, an opposition candidate won a by-election on Tuesday by a surprisingly narrow margin of just 65 votes instead of sweeping to victory in the opposition-held state of Kelantan.
The result suggested that the tide could be turning against the opposition after it won a series of by-elections earlier this year that looked to be building momentum toward victory in general elections that must be held by 2013.
Government officials deny that the new sodomy trial is the result of a political conspiracy against Mr Anwar and say they cannot interfere with judicial proceedings in what is a private matter. A 23-year-old male intern last year accused Mr Anwar of sodomising him on several occasions.
At the start of the trial, Mr Anwar’s lawyers sought medical evidence from the prosecution, which has not yet been provided, to prepare their own case. The defence has said it has seen no physical evidence to support the charges against Mr Anwar.
When the allegations were first aired a year ago, there was widespread public scepticism in Malaysia about the charges since it appeared to be a repeat of events in 1998 when Mr Anwar, then deputy prime minister, had a falling out with Mahathir Mohamad, the then prime minister.
Controversy over the trial could threaten Mr Najib’s attempts to portray himself as a reformer, including relaxing business rules that benefited the ethnic Malay majority at the expense of ethnic Chinese and Indians. Mr Najib is hoping the move could win back minority voters who defected to the opposition in last year’s general election when the government’s parliamentary majority was drastically reduced.
”If you believe there is a political conspiracy, it appears now to be badly mistimed since the situation has changed quite a bit from a year ago when the allegations were first raised,” said Mr Oei. ”The best outcome for Mr Najib is if the case is quickly dropped for lack of evidence.”
But other analysts believe that the government might welcome Mr Anwar’s conviction since he is seen as the only person able to keep the unwieldy three-party opposition coalition together. His removal could lead to the dissolution of the alliance.
No comments:
Post a Comment