Tuesday, January 27, 2015

Phahrolrazi Zawawi peeculiar: PAS president Abdul Hadi You say , I say urination


Returning fire, Hadi should quit PAS and make way for others to take over.  President Hadi & gangs should ask themselves & search their inner conscience NGO Persatuan Ummah Sejahtera Malaysia (PasMa) president Phahrolrazi Zawawi has hinted that PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang should quit the party  PAS does not belong to HADI Awang, Haron Din and the hand full of extremist Conservatives. If this group failed to abide by the decision of the muktamar which is the supreme, then they'd either leave or be ready to be booted out of PAS by the members. Hadi is a failure. He lost 2 states, Terengganu and Kedah and now he wants to back-stab his partners in Pakatan. PAS is nothing with Hadi. PasMa should replace PAS in Pakatan.PAS should take this opportunity to get their house in order. There are many good men and women in the party who realise that old politics will not work for today's Malaysia and that PAS has to change if it wants to serve the people and be part of the coalition to lead the nation. This is the time now to resolve the internal conflict once and for all.

PAS central committee member Nik Mohamad Abduh Nik Abdul Aziz said the two legislators from PAS who had supported PKR president Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail as the new Selangor menteri besar were ‘traitors’. – The Malaysian Insider file pic, September 10, 2014.

Kandasamy, a journalist who works for Kuala Lumpur-based Malaysiakini, an independent online newspaper, was appalled and confused.Why didn't they just say PAS terrorist group?" she asked me later as she reflected on her travels throughout the U.S. "Nearly every Muslim country has condemned what they do as un-Islamic," added Kandasamy, who is a practicing Hindu in the majority-Muslim nation. readmore PAS tidak benar ahli terlibat keganasan, kata Hadi

Jolt for PAS shows that religious mobilisation doesn’t work with Malay voters Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi insist on Islamist agenda  a vulnerable PAS a setback If there is one lesson here it is that PAS must now put its extreme right-wingers into cold storage and get back to centre stage  voters are impatient  big picture message is Malays wants governance, not PAS’s Dewan Ulama distractions. Communalism is past How principle can one be when it cannot even keep promises and reliabilities ? There is nothing the Ulama can repair. PAS is beyond redemption as an Islamic party can be fair to all. All their promises can be breached and broken in the name of God. For that matter, any issue that is not to its advantage will be 'classified' as in God's interest'. PAS is ever willing to work with any devils that professed the same religion. As an UMNO Minister has said - ' PAS is not God'. As such, the call by Mat Sabu that its cleric leaderships reinvent itself is most appropriate. Until and unless this 'reinvention' happens, PAS is not a right partner for Pakatan. It will never be a party that can govern fairly and progressively. A multi racial and multi religious country like Malaysia will be unwise to have PAS helming the govt.

    PAS decides to pull out, then good riddance! Better rid the cancer early and take the consequences than having it fester later
PAS' ideologies and position on most issues of national interest are incompatible with Pakatan. It is obvious that the collaboration so far was purely for an advantage at the polls. Now that they have increased their representation at national and state level, they seem to forget their weak position before and why it had improved in the first place. If they are unable to shed their archaic ideologies and adopt a moderate religious stance, they will destroy whatever Pakatan has built in these last 10 years. The fact that a review is being called shows their arrogance. A split between the moderates and the hard core seems to be inevitable now which is good for Pakatan in the long run. This will repair most of the damage done so far.PAS ulamah should answer, whether their CWC need to be disbanded or not... if such a big decision by cwc can be disregarded, perhaps the cwc should just close shop and hail hadi instead. What is happening in pas is so similar to the drama being played out in selangor...
     The biggest story of the day is undoubtedly  silence on vituperative statements by PAS’s Dewan the likes of  has been interpreted by Muslim as an endorsement and they will penalised his party. It is up to Abdul Hadi  to convince the extreme fringe, besides the top brass  , to avoid unfolding their core agenda  inability to devolve power and give others a sense of participation on equal footing is a major flaw in his  character. This can potentially floor him and prevent from scaling another peak after the one he ascended  he needs to understand that strong provincial leaders will strengthen his edifice as they can’t challenge him from day one.readmore Haron Din can fuck off Religious Mobilisation doesn’t work with Malay voters
In Argos, the Ben Affleck-produced Hollywood film on the escape of six Americans from the Canadian ambassador’s house at the height of the Iranian revolution, the marauding mob, which took over the US embassy, was not just satisfied with holding Americans hostage. Enraged at the unstinted American support, the mob leaders corralled a group of youngsters and ordered them to piece together the shredded bits of photos of the embassy staff taken to identify whether anyone had escaped. The photos were shredded by an unsuspecting staff member after the mob broke the gates and stormed the compound. But the labours of the army of kids did not go waste as the militants chased the embassy staff on the tarmac providing a gripping finale to an edge-ofthe-seat thriller.

   There are a lot of similarities here. PKR's "Kajang Move" has NOT failed,As alliance crumbles the alliance is not dying an untimely death  PAS and Hadi begin blame game As it became clear that the alliance was set to walk into the sunset,The only way forward is to expel PAS from Pakatan and to link up with PasMa comprising of party dissidents who want continued political collaboration with DAP and PKR.


 Azmin is smart enough, he will use his influence to win over his detractors and if it is successful, it can see him possibly become a top leader to lead PKR," he said, adding that Azmin will however not take on his mentor Anwar for fear of a political backlash
PKR deputy president Azmin Ali had been a loyal supporter of Anwar and the party since the beginning of PKR. Although some might disagree with his policies and management style, this is normal in any political party and is a good thing. Why should Hadi even imagine PAS will get the MB’s post, and be able to retain in once the assembly re-convene? 
 I think, PAS will lose a lot of support at the coming GE, so even if they can through some great fortune hold the MB’s post - it will be for one term and PAS will be banished to the wilderness of Kelantan come GE14.
 
But don't let differences be destructive to the core interests of the party. This is democracy. If they don’t like him then vote him out in the next AGM. It’s time to move on.Most people are not shocked at all by Hadi. Perhaps only the holier than thou members of PAS who think that they are better than the rest of the society.Wake up, you are as human as the person next to you so stop dictating to the rakyat how they should behave when you yourself cannot even behave properly.

 
A new generation of leaders is needed beyond Anwar or his family members although their contribution has been important. Nothing is forever and leaders should know when to pass on the baton. Leaders too long in power get ossified just like our Dr Mahathir Mohamad of BN. 
Shah Alam PAS MP Khalid Samad was almost right at the beginning of the MB saga when he cautioned many to be patient and give  Hadi enough rope to hang himself.
After the president’s winding-up speech at the muktamar using unbecoming words like “barua” and “broker” against his party assemblypersons and the coalition partners, it is  indeed Abdul Hadi Awang who got ‘hanged’. Religious preachers should not be involved in politics. This applies to all religions. Historically, the world had suffered and is still suffering when countries are governed by religious preachers or along rigid religious doctrines.
 
In a non-homogenous society like Malaysia, PAS cannot play any meaningful and progressive role if it insists on sticking to its rigid religious doctrines. The country will never develop economically vis a vis the world and religious harmony among the various communities will forever be suspect.
 
Openly condemning another human to hell is no different from the practices of the religious extremists and terrorists. 
Imagine a so-called eminent religious leader using such crude words. Hadi Awang is an intelligent man but why such bitterness, as said by one PAS member, for a post which does not even belongs to the party?It is simply unacceptable that PKR can be accused by the president of PAS of 'buying' PAS state assemblypersons to give Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail majority support in the House. DAP too has been accused of being complicit in PKR's 'treachery'.
 
This is a very serious indictment of PKR, by accusing it of being corrupt. PKR has to respond decisively otherwise it would be lending credence to Hadi's claims thus further damaging PKR.
 
I am convinced the ulama faction has decided to link up with Umno in order to cause the Selangor government to fall. It is vital that DAP and PKR isolate the ulama who have shown themselves to be utterly immoral and duplicitous.
 
The only way forward is to expel PAS from Pakatan and to link up with PasMa comprising of party dissidents who want continued political collaboration with DAP and PKR.
If the word “barua” can be used against his own party members who go against the wishes of his political faction, then the public can also use the word “barua” on Hadi, as he goes against the wishes of all Selangorians and the voters who voted for change.
 
That is the reason this “barua” lost Kedah and Terengganu to BN. Very soon this “barua's” party will be completely wiped out.
 
Why should he be so angry to use such a denigrating word on his own party members? If the MB's post goes back to Pakatan of which PAS is a part of it, as president of the component party he should be happy.
 
It is as if this “barua” wants to hand over control of Selangor to Umno against the wishes of the citizens.
 
Has he an agenda of his own, or for another, Umno perhaps, to bring down Pakatan Rakyat? Or his hatred for PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim, unknown till now, had got him unbalanced?
 We know he is medically unwell and he is not likely to remain as president for long; so was this his last ‘bravo’, silly as it is, to severe his ties with the Pakatan partners?
Hadi is behaving like disgraced US president Richard Nixon. As head of PAS, he thinks he can do no wrong.He makes his own rules. He breaks ranks with his coalition partners. He overrules his central committee and acts unilaterally. He goes back on his words by submitting two PAS candidates for MB after assuring the public PAS was not after the MB’s post.He acts like a thug setting his attack dogs on everyone who is against him, including his own party moderates.He attacks his own Aduns (state representatives) who acted to protect the interests of Pakatan and Selangorians. He is willing to go to war with everyone to justify his wrongdoings.There can be no graceful retirement for Hadi. Like Nixon, he must resign. Or he must be kicked out.

A leading American academic, however, offers a glimmer of hope for western politicians wishing to find a way out of the maze. Many Iranians are increasingly questioning the role of clerics in politics and believe that the country would be better served if they stayed out of politics.
Many Iranians are also staunch nationalists who think first of their country and wish to see it play a bigger role in the region, unlike religious zealots or Islamists.
Jon B Alterman, senior vice-president, Middle East programme director and Zbigniew Brzezinski Chair in Global Security & Geostrategy at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, also says that not all Iranians, even within the government and the political parties, can be tagged as Islamic fundamentalists. The common western perception about Iran is one of a group of religious zealots who wish to bring about armageddon.
That view may not be entirely correct, Mr Alterman says, adding that many Iranians are fervent nationalists who take pride in their history and believe that the country has been shortchanged by the Shah administration, which ruled the country before the Revolution in 1979.
“There are more Iranian nationalists than anybody gives them credit for being. A lot of them are about Iran and they are nationalists and they think of their imperial history, about their role in the region. I read Qasem Suleimani, despite the fact he heads the Quds force, which is named after Jerusalem, as a nationalist through and through.”
Mr Alterman says he believes that many of the problems in dealing with Iran stem from that country’s preoccupation with a sense of weakness. As a former empire, they believe they have not been allotted their rightful due. “They are terrified that a deal (nuclear agreement with the US) will reveal them to be even weaker than they are rather than the position they would like to be as a near peer of the US. As soon as you make a deal that would make them drop down. That becomes a self-defeating proposition and their isolation from the world makes them progressively weaker which makes them progressively more anxious about the possibility of an agreement which then becomes a cycle.”
Mr Alterman also believes that many Iranians are now starting to question the hold of clergy in politics. They believe that Iran will be best served by having a clergy that plays no role in politics.
“It argues that clerics should stick to God and politicians to politics,” he added. “There is strong a view in the clerical establishment in Qom (major religious city in Iran) that clerics have to get out of politics.” It has not enhanced status of the country, it has not increased religious population, more youngster turning away from religion. “Is Iran best served by having clerics playing the role they play? They tend to be of a certain generation and it is not beyond the realm of possibility that the system in Iran undergoes a certain transformation in the coming years.”

No comments: