LORD NAJIB THE PROTECTOR OF COWS HOW TO BE A WINNER AMONG LOSERS

Put Mahathir on the stand. Enough said. The ex-PM must be tried for high treason! What risk? The elections will be held before the RCI report is out. No one will be implicated. Why? Because this is not in the terms of reference. The traitors in UMNO would go free as a result. A sham RCI without nailing traitors and acts of TREASON. Dr Chong Eng Leong’s claim that “only one third of Sabah citizens, or 1.6 million people, were genuine Sabahans. The rest became citizens under the citizenship-for-votes scheme dubbed ‘Project IC’ or ‘Project M’ (M for Mahathir), on top of one to two million more foreigners in the country.”, shows the extent of Mahathir’s atrocity of political re-engineering to drastically alter the demographic of Sabah and that of the country. This is perhaps the most unscrupulous, damaging piece of Mahathir’s misrule during his 22 year reign. Of course, Lim Ket Siang is right in saying this illegal act is now being duplicated and extended to Peninsula, especially Selangor in effort to wrest control of the state. Najib does not call Sabah as BN’s ‘fixed deposits’ for nothing, it’s not Sabah as such but rather the newly neutralized illegals in exchange for votes.What risk! They have rigged the RCI to say what they want to in the end. Haven’t we Malaysians learnt our lessons from this corrupt ruling regime. Its all a smoke screen for the GE13.LKS is absolutely right. The RCI TOR is seriously lacking as to investigating who was involved in introducing and implementing it. We all know who is, because the BN govt and it’s pm are responsible for this. Something like this can’t be done without knowledge and initiation of the PM himself. So that is the very reason for not touching on that subject. Protecting mahathir, Sabah umno leaders, NRD and EC , even police in coordinating all this. The TOR makes it sound that there is NO Treason in this case? Shameful tOR and yet najib is being applauded? Najib is the Mr Shame himself , don’t expect anything. Steve can only say what umno will allow him to investigate or say in terms of findings

What we are interested to know is will the RCI on Illegal Immigrant in Sabah just end like other RCI’s like Lingam, TBH………?Will Steve Shim accept after 1) refusing to be included in the Bersih 3 panel? And more importantly 2) after seeing his effort in the Lingam gate inquiry conveniently marked “NFA”?Reminder Najib Hope its will not end up just as TBH and Lingam Case.With other as well.RCI finding are gethering dust no NFA.Why due to TUN M was found one of them to save his neck equally Macc Necks as wellAny guess what will come out after the completion of this RCI, if it is allowed to complete before GE13? This Ajib is just buying time. He completely ignore a request for one earlier and now, knowing how much this so-called safe deposit has deteriorated, he was forced to go begging and making promises – as we know, his promises are meant to be broken and forgotten till the next time he needs you. He is obviously a puppet with strings being pulled. Absolutely confused what he is doing – totally inconceivable all these flip-floppings by him for a person in his position  It will be another Teoh Beng Hock. They annnounced the RCI before the by election to placate voters. After the election, they just abused the verdict, and no one was punished when MACC was squarely cornered. If you all believe Najib, he will take you to hell.The influx of Illegal is due to wide border within Indonesia/philipine.To find out past issue is one thing but the remedy for now and furture, Should their be a promineint person from the ATM Border /cost guard,Navy,Marine police rope in as well like the time during vietam days.They were task to sent them off with some place in a island until they return back to their home land proper

PR CAN ESTABLISH A BETTER RCI FOR MALAYSIA COZ THOSE FROM SABAH PROJECT IC ARE NOW ALL OVER M’SIA.JUST IMAGINE HOW CAN A CROOK CATCH ITS MASTER!

have an additional term:suggest two more tor: One: to establish and disclose any special directive (and by who), to solicit and issue Malaysian Blue ICs and citizenship documents to persons illegally and wilfully. Two: to establish and disclose any special unit/task force/clandestine operation within the Malaysian public service to carry out illegal directive to solicit and issue Malaysian Blue ICs and citizenship documents to persons illegally and wilfully. Who issued directive for issuance of citizenship to non qualified immigrants. a RCI now and just like before just ignore its recommendations! Just stop pulling the wool over our eyes! BN is desperate, as its looking at its “fixed deposit” turning into a “debt” account! It would be better for PR to conduct an RCI with fresh terms of reference, instead of the trash at present!What “wide ranging” terms of reference is this? Why isn’t there a term to find the culprits behind this and bring them to justice? They are traitors. How can you confer citizenship to illegals. Mahathir says it’s ok. What logic is this? These traitors need to be brought to justice. A RCI that does not address this is NOT a RCI but a eye wash. Sabahans should vote BN out to get justice!Term of Reference 9 : To determine the person(s) who directed the issuance of blue identity cards to illegal immigrants in violation of the laws and recommend the actions to be taken against them terms of reference do seem fairly comprehensive on the face of it, which is a surprise. How’ve, since it is unlikely to report, or any action taken, prior to the GE, it’s outcome is somewhat academic unless PKR take over Putrajaya (please god!). The other big question is whether it’s recommendations will ever be implemented or will they just be shlved like all the previous RCIs. Another reason why PKR must take over Putrajaya.

Prime Minister Najib Razak has announced an 8-point terms of referencefor a long-awaited Royal Commission of Inquiry into Sabah’s illegal migrants problem, but he failed to stem the tide of indignation sweeping through the state, with the people still deeply angered by his federal government’s perceived bad faith towards them through the decades.

“We fear it is another eyewash. Most of the panel members are staunch BN supporters who have worked as top civil servants. They will surely try to show their gratitude to Najib and Mahathir,” PKR vice president Tian Chua told Malaysia Chronicle.

“The other factor is the 6-months time-frame. We believed the RCI was intentionally delayed so as to allow Najib and BN to dodge the outcome of the RCI findings until after the 13th general election. I think we all know

about President Obama and Mitt Romney’s being two unelectable candidates about to face off in the general election.

There were many unanswered questions at the time, and much has transpired since, but let’s take a look again at the equation.

Well, different day, same story. After all these many months, we still have two unelectable candidates running against each other. If you look at historical precedents, Gov. Romney and President Obama wouldn’t be able to win this presidential election. But because they face each other, someone has to win this very tight election.

Let’s take a look at President Obama. According to the latest Gallup poll ratings, his approval has been stuck at roughly 47 percent for months. No incumbent president has won re-election with an approval rating consistently in the 40s. Further, Gallup rates the direction of the country, and today it has 28 percent of Americans satisfied with how things are going, and 69 percent dissatisfied. In 2004, in that close election for President Bush, the numbers were 44 percent satisfied and 54 percent dissatisfied, a whopping net difference for President Obama of minus 31 points.

Further, the Consumer Confidence numbers that Bloomberg News tracks on consumer attitudes toward the economy and spending show the latest levels at minus 39.7. A number much more akin to President George H. W. Bush. who lost re-election (minus 42), than President George W. Bush, who won re-election (minus 5).

Now, Gov. Romney’s turn. His personal ratings in the latest ABC News poll show him with a net negative of minus 9 points (40 percent view him favorably, 49 percent view him unfavorably). He finished the primary season with the lowest favorability of any nominee since ABC News-Washington Post has been doing polling the past 28 years. No nominee of a major party has won the presidency with that high a negative favorability going into Election Day.

So, where does this leave us?

First, this is some explanation for why the campaigns have conducted themselves the way they have. Neither one, it seems, can run and win on its own record or its own approval. This is why for the past few weeks, 90 percent of the television ads run by both campaigns have been negative. And this doesn’t seem likely to change. It seems the message from Romney is “Fire Obama,’ and from President Obama it is, “Don’t Hire Romney.”

Second, the electorate is almost totally polarized at this point, with Republicans solidly backing Romney and Democrats solidly behind the president. And each side is unified in its dislike for the opposing party candidate, so there doesn’t look like much room to gather votes across the aisle. And so the battleground for this election will be a tiny percentage of swing voters (roughly 5 or 6 percent) who are either undecided or soft in their support; meaning this seems to be an election that is likely to stay within the margin of error all the way until November, absent a major surprise or mistake.

In February, I speculated that this might leave room for a third party. That is no longer possible because the major-party supporters are solidly behind their candidates. And I also thought that Romney might be able to adjust the equation by unifying the Republicans. He has done so, but so has the president with Democrats. So it’s a wash.

Two unelectable candidates running overwhelming negative campaigns against each other will result in one’s winning and one’s losing in November, but with the winner unlike to have a mandate for governing or a vision that the public was behind. And with the results in congressional races likely to produce a Congress even more split, it certainly doesn’t bode well for functional governing next year.

I hold out hope that in the next three months something will break this dynamic, and give us an opportunity to deal with the major issues in a positive way. But I am realistic that whoever wins the election as president might be akin to the No. 2 finisher at the Tour de France who won because the winner was disqualified.

 GE-13 will surely be called within these 6 months.”READMOREhttp://lawmattersjournalmalaysia.blogspot.com/2012/08/lord-najib-protector-of-cows-how-to-be.html