This is small matter,you have not see what this two most powerful department can do…or d entire Govn Departments. They are the Law In This Country…its up to their interpretation,is white and they can say is black…what can we Rakyat do ?
The only thing that we can do is change this Govn and whoever take over must do the Right Thing to correct the Wrong.
The Abuse Of Power is run so deeply in their Blood and so far,nobody have ever,even mention or can do anything about it.Musa Hassan and Gani Patail were accused today as being the cause of the destruction of the criminal justice system by having allowed falsified evidence against Anwar Ibrahim in 1998 and later lying about an investigation of Mahathir Mohamad for abuse of power.
YUSOF ZAINAL ABIDEN JUST SHIT HIS PANTS… Yusof Zainal Abiden is lead prosecutor in Sodomy II. He volunteered his services as Anwar Ibrahim’s political assassin… Look what a fine mess he’s got himself into! related article http://malaysiakita786.blogspot.com/2011/08/trial-behind-sodomy-trial-1-dictator.html ANNA SYARIZA ON SAIFOOL SEXUAL CHEMISTRY FROM AGONY TO ECSTASY EZAM, SHAHRIR, NAJIB MUSTAPA MOHAMED ,RODWAM PART OF FOOTBALL TEAM …Read more
UNTRUTH AND FALSIFICATIONS PERVERTERS OF JUSTICE NAJIB CREATING GENIUSES IN MALAYSIA
RELATEDARTICLEhttp://taxidriverstreetvoices.blogspot.com/2011/12/umno-ass-reality-curse-of-anwars-sodomy.html
Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s image took another major beating today when leading British daily The Guardian predicted Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim would soon become a victim of “egregious, politically suspect injustice” in his sodomy trial.
In a scathing commentary, the UK daily’s assistant editor and foreign affairs columnist, Simon Tisdall, even urged Malaysia’s western allies in the UK and US to “take a closer look at their friend.”
Tisdall argued that the Najib government’s handling of Anwar’s “highly dubious” sodomy charge warranted closer scrutiny of the country’s democratic practices.
Among others, Tisdall sniped at Najib for his “authoritarian tendencies” and “blatant political scaremongering”, even accusing the prime minister of lacking in originality for recycling the sodomy charges against Anwar and being accustomed to wielding power due to his family lineage of top political leaders.
Tisdall argued that the Najib government’s handling of Anwar’s “highly dubious” sodomy charge warranted closer scrutiny of the country’s democratic practices.Among others, Tisdall sniped at Najib for his “authoritarian tendencies” and “blatant political scaremongering”, even accusing the prime minister of lacking in originality for recycling the sodomy charges against Anwar and being accustomed to wielding power due to his family lineage of top political leaders.“If Anwar is found guilty — and the trial judge seems to have made up his mind already — he will not be the only or even the most important victim of an egregious, politically suspect injustice.“Malaysia’s democratic reputation will have been critically wounded, and for that outrage, Malaysians will have their prime minister, Najib Razak, to thank,” Tisdall said.
“Najib gives every appearance of preparing for snap polls on the assumption that Anwar will be out of the way and the opposition decapitated,” Tisdall said, referring to Najib’s rallying battle cry to Umno during the party’s just-concluded annual general assembly.
During the meet, said to be Umno’s last before the polls, Najib had urged party members to prepare for the “most crucial” election to date as it would be a “tragedy” should Pakatan Rakyat (PR) wrest federal power.
But Najib had nearly faced such a “tragedy”, Tisdall said, referring to the international condemnation the prime minister had earned following his government’s strong-arm tactics in clamping down on Bersih 2.0’s march for free and fair elections.
He said the uncharacteristic public display of discontent during the tumultuous July 9 event was spurred by factors like spending cuts, alleged corruption and cronyism, claims of a defective electoral system, curbs on public assembly and debate, and press censorship.
In an equally biting article shortly after the rally, Tisdall had then called the government “gormless” for clamping down on the march and warned it against adopting the “Mubarak model” to run the country.
He noted today that after backlash over the rally, Najib is “taking no chances”.
“Having more or less reneged on shaky, post-July promises of civil rights reform, Najib is now pushing through remodelled restrictions in the form of the Peaceful Assembly Act,” he said.
But Tisdall joined the federal opposition and several civil society groups here in criticising the law that was just passed in the Dewan Rakyat.
“Najib’s idea of engaging the ‘new generation’ of young Malaysians is to ban anyone under the age of 21 from organising a protest,” he said.
As such, Tisdall surmised it was unlikely the government would stick to its promise to US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton last year that Anwar would receive fair judgement, claiming the opposition leader’s case is now approaching an “ugly climax”.
“The next question is: What will Malaysians and their friends do about it?” he said.
On the face of it, Sodomy II is the trial of opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim by his accuser, Saiful Bukhari Azlan. In truth, Sodomy II is also the rakyat’s trial. It is one where Malaysians are pitted against government misrule, miscarriages of justice and institutionalised repression.
Sodomy II represents a fight to restore democratic rights, for public institutions to recover their integrity, for the judiciary to be made independent and for the police to regain the public’s respect.
To most observers, trial judge Mohd Zabidin Mohd Diah, appears to have decided Anwar’s fate already.
So who has the most to gain, if Anwar were to be jailed when the judge delivers his verdict?
Who was frustrated when the sodomy charge in Sodomy I was overturned in 2004 by the Supreme Court and Anwar was freed?
The answer is not Prime minister Najib Abdul Razak, but the former PM, Mahathir Mohamad. Najib will be pleased, but Mahathir will be ecstatic.
Najib and the other corrupt BN politicians, their families and cronies, will heave a collective sigh of relief.
But for Mahathir, it is the settling of old scores. His political legacy and dynasty can then prosper, without interference. A corrupt person can continue his evil deeds only if he is surrounded by people with no integrity and low principles.
When Anwar’s earlier sodomy conviction was overturned by the Supreme Court in 2004, Mahathir was livid, as were the handful of other individuals who wanted Anwar to remain behind bars.
Anwar said yesterday, that he was "prepared for the best, but expected the worst" when asked to comment about what he thought the judge’s verdict would be on his case.
Last June, Anwar’s three attempts to have Zabidin recused failed. Anwar’s first attempt was when Zabidin failed to take action against Utusan Malaysia for unfair reporting. Zabidin had also threatened to cite Karpal Singh for contempt.
Anwar’s second attempt was when Zabidin "pre-judged" the trial when he said complainant Saiful Bukhari’s testimony was "reliable" and that it would "establish all the facts required to prove the charge against the accused". Zabidin relied solely on Saiful’s testimony.
In-depth studies based on various intelligence reports, have shown Najib’s cabinet, that they will fare badly in GE-13. Political observers claim that Najib will want Anwar incarcerated and announce the date for GE-13 during the period set aside for him to appeal.
Najib will claim that he did not put Anwar in jail, but the judge did.
Perhaps, this is what autocratic rulers say, when they absolve themselves of their responsibilities and shift the blame onto others in their administration.
Remember how Mahathir denied that he had ordered Operation Lalang and said that the crackdown had been authorised by the IGP Haniff Omar?
Or as in the current news, President Assad of Syria declared recently, that he did not order the brutal retaliation on his people, and that it was his army which was responsible for the violence.
At a press conference yesterday, Mahathir questioned the need for international NGOs to levy corruption charges against Sarawak Chief Minister Abdul Taib Mahmud.
He said, "When an election is near, you get funny things like this coming out.
"If it is just a political game to try and undermine somebody’s political image then I think it is not right."
Mahathir ignores the fact that the timing for the finale of Sodomy II, is set against a backdrop of GE-13. Did he think this was a coincidence?
Perhaps, Mahathir has got Alzheimer’s. In Sodomy I, Anwar faced charges of corruption and sodomy because Anwar, Mahathir’s protégé, refused to bail out companies, during the Asian financial crisis in 1997, using taxpayer’s money. Some of these companies belonged to his son and cronies.
Anwar became a threat to Mahathir and had to be removed. It did not help that others in Umno were jealous of the close relationship that Mahathir and Anwar enjoyed.
In 2008, Najib, who was the prime minister in waiting, was faced with Anwar becoming a threat to his premiership and to Umno domination in Malaysian politics.
Najib realised that Anwar had to be removed, especially as his mass appeal was increasing and he was able to galvanise the fragmented opposition parties. Unfortunately, Najib is not very creative and his plan, to remove Anwar, involved rehashing the previous one made by Mahathir. Thus, Sodomy II was conceived.
But Najib’s blundering ways mean that whatever he does, lacks planning and detail, just like the cursory effort that was put into his Peaceful Assembly Bill (PAB) which then needed urgent amendment barely 24 hours after being tabled.
Nevertheless, Mahathir will be pleased at the prospect of Anwar being jailed. His dream will finally be realised.
Malaysians must be feeling a state of déjà vu. In 1998, for Sodomy I, a soiled mattress was dragged into court, Anwar was poisoned with arsenic and the charges of Anwar having sex with a range of people, to lurid sexploits related by the virgin Queen, Ummi Hafilda, made Malaysian courts a laughing stock.
In 2011, the seedy plots have varied little. The only changes are the actors like Saiful, his semen stained briefs and the allegations of him having sex with several men as his rectal swabs carried the semen of several men.
These are mere distractions. The main thrust is that Najib needs to win GE-13, by hook or by crook.
Losing means he will be made accountable for his part in the corruption scandals which have dogged Malaysia. He will have to answer for the Scorpene scandal and the murder of Altantuya Shaaribu, amongst others. His ministers will have their own corruption scandals to deal with.
Mahathir’s reason is simple. He does not want previous illegal deals to be aired by Anwar, who must have been privy to them, when he was Finance minister.
All Mahathir wants is his political dynasty to continue via his son, and his family to keep their business empire, which was built on public money.
No comments:
Post a Comment