So you mother fucker asshole Proate one
readmore click this Mr Saiful has told the court that he went to visit Mr NajibThat an ordinary citizen should have been granted such access has stoked suspicions.
TO ASSHOLE LEADERS OF BARISAN NATIONAL WHO THINK NOTHING BUT ASSHOLE SINCE SODOMY I TO SODOMY 11,ACCEPT MY LITTLE ANG POW PLEASE
Umno Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin today failed in his bid to set aside a judgment in default obtained by Opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim in a RM100 million defamation suit.
Anwar's counsel S.N.Nair told reporters that High Court Senior Assistant Registrar Nazri Yahya dismissed with costs Khairy's application to set aside the judgment in default.
Anwar was also represented by counsel Wan Anwar Shadat, while Datuk Seri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah and Badrul Munir Bukhari appeared for Khairy.
On Dec 4, 2008, Anwar obtained a judgement in default from the High Court against Khairy when he failed to enter an appearance after the writ of summons had been served on him.
Khairy filed the application to set aside the judgement on Feb 20, 2009.
Anwar, 63, filed the suit against Khairy on March 7, 2008 claiming that Khairy, as the then Umno Youth vice chief, had uttered defamatory words and caused the posting on websites including Malaysiakini.com a video clip entitled "Anwar and kin no threat".
Anwar claimed the video clip on Malaysiakini.com contained defamatory words spoken by Khairy at a ceramah in Lembah Pantai, Kuala Lumpur on or about Feb 20, 2008.
He said the defamatory words, among others, meant he was involved in activities contradictory to Islam, did not have good character and was not fit to hold political or other positions.
He sought RM100 million in aggravated and exemplary damages as well as other relief deemed fit by the court.
Judge went to see Mamathir and asked for his advice. He wanted to know how the case is to be decided - in favour of DSAI or Anwar - as the judge knows that Mamathir hates them both. Mamathir did not take long to decide. And the judge ruled accordingly. Now we know who Mamathir hates more. Hopefully, Khairy is made a bankrupt and barred from taking part in politics. Mukhriz then becomes UMNO youth chief and a full minister.
That pariah and corrupted Mamak ex-dicktator of Kerala origin must be getting a natural high from hearing about Khairy's legal proceeding case. His less than average son or moron, Mukhriz probably came all over the place ! must be real happy hearing the outcome of Rembau monkey's case.
And his less than average son or moron, Mukhriz have a much better prospect to move up the ladder now, it seems.
Since when has an UMNO member lost a case in court? Khairy lost this one at a time when the judiciary is still controlled by UMNO. So who do you think wants to get rid of Khairy? Remember he was not given a ministerial post even though he was head of UMNO Youth? So is the Mamak is playing his games again? Not that I have any sympathy for Khairy. I think he deserves it. They are all villains.
I heard someone screwed a Chinese businessman for RM 400M just before the last GE. I cannot confirm this but this Chinaman has settled his "debts" and must be very happy Khairy's balls are cooked. Maybe, he will be twisting the arms of some other Chinese businessman to settle his debt. Not Vincent Tan because Vincent Tan is under the control of his mortal enemy. He has run out of Chinese friends who have the capacity to help him. Maybe Diam but Diam also takut who he offends.
Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim succeeded today in obtaining a visit tomorrow by the High Court to the condominium complex where he was alleged to have sodomised a former aide, in order to help establish an alibi in his ongoing sodomy trial.
Anwar’s lawyer, Karpal Singh, obtained court approval today to visit the scene of the alleged crime.
“We want to have a relook at the place. We can have a look at it and it will be done before trial resumes at 2.15pm in the afternoon,” Karpal told The Malaysian Insider.
According to the veteran lawyer, Anwar’s alibi against Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan’s allegations of sodomy was that at the time when Saiful had alleged he was sodomised in a unit at the Desa Damansara Condominium, Anwar was in an opposite unit with five other people.
When asked whether these individuals would be called in the course of the trial, Karpal replied in the affirmative.
“Yes, if the defence demands it, then we will call them to testify,” said Karpal.
Another lawyer in Anwar’s team, Sankara Nair, said the police would give them a reply by 12pm.
But The Malaysian Insider now understands that plans to visit the scene of the crime have been postponed for the time being.
The owner of the unit, known only as Hasanuddin, was apparently in Bukit Merah and would not be able to return in time before the trial proceeds this afternoon.
“The owner of the condo is currently in Bukit Merah. We will talk to the judge after lunch to explain and update him on what’s happening, so maybe we can visit the condominium tomorrow,” said Sankara.
Sankara said they would first see who the prosecution calls to testify in the afternoon, and they would notify the court as necessary if they had any requests or objections.
At the beginning of the trial today, Karpal told the court that various attempts have been made to contact the owner of the condominum, but to no avail.
He insisted that the defence team be allowed to visit the scene of the alleged crime.
“We are not asking for a ruling, but perhaps a direction to the investigating officer. We can’t very well break into the condominium,” replied Karpal to judge Datuk Mohamed Zabidin Mohd Diah, who had asked Karpal whether he was expecting a ruling from the court to demand the police to allow access to the unit.
This led Solicitor-General II Datuk Yusof Zainal Abiden to suggest that the defence team should have no problem contacting the owner of the unit since he was “Anwar’s friend.”
This triggered a short outburst from the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) de facto leader.
“He (Hasanuddin) is scared, tak boleh macam itu (you cannot do that),” said Anwar.
This morning’s proceedings also saw a continuation of the sodomy trial’s star witness’ cross-examination by Anwar’s legal team.
“On June 24, you met with Datuk Seri Najib Razak, the then-deputy prime minister at his residence. You made a complaint. That you were sodomised without consent.
“Did he give advice (on what to do?)” asked Karpal.
Saiful also said that the same complaint was made to ASP Mohamed Rodhwan Mohd Yusof, Senator Ezam Md Noor, Datuk Mumtaz Jaafar as well as others he had spoken to before lodging a report on June 28.
“What you said is serious. DPM Najib did not make police report after hearing you. He can be imprisoned. It is an offence under section 202 of the Penal Code,” said Karpal to Saiful, who then replied that he was not aware of that fact.
Saiful also claimed that the proximity of his oath taken at a mosque to the date of the Permatang Pauh by-election was a mere “coincidence”.
“After the alleged sodomy on June 26, there were a lot of chances to make [a] police report, to escape, but you did not do so,” said Karpal, to which Saiful conceded.
Karpal then told the court that further questions would depend on the outcome of the visit to the scene of the alleged crime.
When questioned by the prosecution, Saiful maintained that he did not tell Dr Mohd Osman Abdul Hamid of Hospital Pusrawi that he had been sodomised by Anwar.
Saiful claimed he never said that he has been sodomised with a plastic object, and that he had only heard about the report for the first time in court.
Anwar, the 62-year-old de facto leader of PKR, is charged with sodomising Saiful at Unit 11-5-1 of the Desa Damansara Condominium in Jalan Setiakasih, Bukit Damansara here between 3.01pm and 4.30pm on June 26, 2008.
The former deputy prime minister has denied the charge, describing it as “evil, frivolous lies by those in power” when the charge was read out to him. He is charged under section 377B of the Penal Code and can be sentenced to a maximum of 20 years’ jail and whipping upon conviction. The trial is taking place 18 months after Anwar was charged in court in August 2008.
Anwar was charged with sodomy and corruption in 1998 after he was sacked from the Cabinet and was later convicted and jailed for both offences. He was freed in September 2004 and later resurrected his political career by winning back his Permatang Pauh Parliamentary seat in a by-election in 2008, which had been held in the interim by his wife.
He had earlier led the opposition coalition Pakatan Rakyat to a historic sweep of five states and 82 parliamentary seats in Election 2008.
After lunch, Karpal informed the court that the defence team could only visit the condominium complex at 2.30pm tomorrow afternoon, and requested that the trial be adjourned till then.
Mohd Diah then ruled that the proceedings would start at 3.30pm tomorrow afternoon, after the visit.
Karpal told reporters outside court that his team would be bringing in its own medical experts this Thursday should the prosecution move to question the doctors who examined Saiful.
He also said the defence will continue with Saiful’s cross-examination at 3.30pm.
FOR SODOMY 1&2 READ THIS
Ummi confesses to being the architect behind the Anwar sodomy allegation; a purely fabricated charge During the earlier trial, it was revealed that the Special Branch tried to convince Anwar to “take action” but that Anwar refused, until pressed further by the Director who said it was “for the sake of national security” before Anwar agreed that action be taken.
In a new twist to the Anwar Saga, it was revealed that Ummi Hafilda Ali was the architect behind the accusation that Anwar had sodomised Azizan Abu Bakar. And, for this, she was disowned by her father just months before he died of a broken heart.
Christopher Fernando told the
What is most interesting by this revelation is that:
SHAFEE ABDULLAH Fixing and Finishing ANWAR IBRAHIM
In this special police operations centre in Umno lawyer Shafee Abdullah’s law firm is a whiteboard and on this whiteboard are two names: Anwar Ibrahim and Raja Petra Kamarudin. Below these two names are all sorts of notes, scribblings and etchings.
Very troubling reports have been published, which reveal the existence of a medical report of an examination done by a doctor on Mohd Saiful Bukhari bin Azlan a few hours before Saiful lodged a police report that he had been sodomised. The medical report apparently shows that there is no evidence that he had been sodomised by anyone.
Such reports raise some very serious questions that require immediate answers:
(1) Are the police in possession of such a medical report?
(2) Was the doctor concerned interviewed by the police and was he detained for any length of time?
(3) Is the doctor concerned facing any form of intimidation and, if so, by whom?
(4) Is there a medical report by another doctor that either confirms or contradicts the first medical report?
(5) If it is true that the medical report exists showing a lack of prima facie evidence, what then could have been the justification for the vigorous actions taken against Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim as well as the public call by the authorities for his DNA sample?
The answers to these questions are of paramount importance, as they bring into focus the integrity of our law enforcement system.
These latest disclosures regarding the investigations into the sodomy allegations are not the only ones to raise questions that need answering. There is, for example, also the issue of P. Balasubramaniam’s abrupt “disappearance” that has yet to be satisfactorily explained. No one can deny that the circumstances of his first and second statutory declarations are highly unusual. All these show a pattern of events that cause much disquiet to right-thinking members of the public.
The Malaysian people are deeply troubled. A country that truly believes in the rule of law should not be faced with so many disturbing developments and unanswered questions.
The credibility of the Malaysian justice system as a whole is therefore at stake. The integrity of professionals, be they doctors or lawyers, must never be interfered with. The public must be left in no doubt that the criminal justice system in this country will not be misused or abused. There must be nothing less than an open and thorough investigation into these cases. This calls for the courage and professionalism of all those involved to do the right thing no matter the consequences. And those who have shown such courage and integrity must know that they live in a country where it is safe to do so.
Dato’ Ambiga Sreenevasan
President
Malaysian Bar
*************************************************
What Ambiga said in her press statement above is certainly true and she has cause for concern. But she would be even more concerned if she knows what we know about this whole matter.
A special police operations centre was set up some time ago to coordinate all activities related to the Anwar Ibrahim sodomy crisis. No, the special police operations centre was not set up AFTER the alleged sodomy act took place on 26 June 2008. It was set up way before 26 June 2008.
Why the need to set up a special police operations centre BEFORE the date of the alleged sodomy act? Are they clairvoyant and did they peep into their crystal ball and ‘see’ the crime happen before it actually happened? Was the special police operations centre set up so that they could solve the crime? Or was the special police operations centre set up BEFORE the date of the ‘crime’ so that they could invent the so-called crime?
Yes, questions and yet more questions. But this is not yet the icing on the cake. The icing on the cake is that this special police operations centre is not located in the police headquarters. It is located in the meeting room of the office of prominent Umno lawyer Shafee Abdullah who possesses a notorious reputation for fixing cases such as those involving the people implicated in murdering Altantuya Shaariibuu or those alleged to have pinched the bottoms of cigar girls in the Havana Club in Kuala Lumpur.
Name me any questionable case and you will find the hand of Shafee Abdullah behind that case. And this same person is coordinating the Anwar Ibrahim sodomy allegation from the meeting room of his law office in
There are four police officers headed by an officer name Aziz who are based in this special police operations centre in the meeting room of Shafee Abdullah’s law firm. But why are they based in an Umno lawyer’s office instead of in the police headquarters? Is this an official police operation or is this a rogue operation? Yes, we have watched many
In this special police operations centre in Umno lawyer Shafee Abdullah’s law firm is a whiteboard and on this whiteboard are two names: Anwar Ibrahim and Raja Petra Kamarudin. Below these two names are all sorts of notes, scribblings and etchings. There are also charts and strategies on how both Anwar Ibrahim and Raja Petra Kamarudin can be implicated in various crimes and incarcerated until their teeth fall out of their gums.
Yes, the police report to Umno lawyer Shafee Abdullah. And Shafee Abdullah coordinates this special police operation with the IGP and AG. And the purpose of this special police operations centre in the meeting room of Umno lawyer Shafee Abdullah’s law firm is to explore how to incarcerate Anwar Ibrahim and Raja Petra Kamarudin. And the special police operations centre has to be in Umno lawyer Shafee Abdullah’s office and not in the police headquarters because, officially, the IGP and AG are not involved in the Anwar sodomy case, as announced by Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.
Shafee Abdullah is no ordinary man. In fact, he is not even a man; he is a devil. But he is
That is why Senior Assistant Commissioner (SAC) II Mohd Rodwan Mohd Yusof did not meet Saiful in the police station or at the police headquarters. The special police operations centre is not in the police station or at the police headquarters. It is in the meeting room of Umno lawyer Shafee Abdullah’s law firm. So it would be dangerous to meet Saiful in this law firm lest someone finds out. That is why Rodwan met Saiful in room 619 of the Concorde Hotel.
Okay, so Rodwan met Saiful one day before the alleged crime took place. But then maybe Rodwan is clairvoyant or he has a crystal ball and he ‘saw’ that a crime of sodomy was going to take place the following day. Some people do have this gift of ‘foresight’. Nevertheless, whether the timeline appears a bit out of sync or not, they still have the ‘evidence’ to work on to ‘prove’ that Anwar did sodomise Saiful the day AFTER Saiful met Rodwan in room 619 of the Concorde Hotel.
One such crucial evidence was supposed to be the doctor from Pusrawi’s medical examination of Saiful at 2.00pm on Saturday, 28 June 2008. But then the doctor said that he had examined Saiful and found no evidence of sodomy. This report has since surfaced and the doctor has gone missing so, now, there is no way they can use this evidence.
The next evidence was supposed to be the second medical examination done at the Hospital Kuala Lumpur (HKL) at 4.00pm on Saturday, 28 June 2008. But then the outpatient department of the HKL was closed at 4.00pm on Saturday, 28 June 2008. So how could a second medical examination have been done? Yes, that’s right. No second medical examination was done and the doctors at the HKL refuse to doctor a medical report to say that the second medical examination had been done, when none had been done, or to say that they did find evidence of sodomy, when they did not.
Since none of the doctors at Pusrawi or HKL are cooperating with the police, the last piece of ‘evidence’ will have to be Saiful’s underwear. Okay, Saiful’s underwear does not really have Anwar’s semen stains on it. But this is a small matter. As long as someone from the Chemistry Department is prepared to testify that they did examine Saiful’s underwear and they did find Anwar’s semen stains on it, then that would be good enough. They will be able to build their case against Anwar and charge him for sodomy based on this ‘evidence’ from the Chemistry Department.
No, the Chemistry Department has NOT come out with their report yet. There is no report from the Chemistry Department that says they found Anwar’s semen stains on Saiful’s underwear. This is because they first of all need Anwar’s specimen so that they can plant it on the underwear and so that the Chemistry Department can then ‘discover’ it.
But Anwar is being bloody silly. He is being extremely pigheaded and stubborn. He refuses to hand over his specimen. How can they plant Anwar’s semen on Saiful’s underwear when Anwar refuses to let them take his specimen? The Chemistry Department can’t prepare its report saying that it found Anwar’s semen on Saiful’s underwear until the police are able to plant it there. But Anwar does not want to voluntarily hand over his specimen so this plan is being upset a bit.
But never mind. As soon as Parliament convenes later this month they will rush through a new law that will make it mandatory for you to hand over your specimen if the police demands that you do so. Refusing to hand over your specimen when the police demand you do so will soon become a crime and you can be sent to jail. They will try to pass this law before Merdeka Day of 31 August 2008 and they will try to backdate the law and make it retrospective so that any ‘crime’ committed before the passing of this law will also be covered.
Soon they will get Anwar once the DNA Act becomes law and Anwar can no longer refuse to hand over his specimen. Then, once they have obtained Anwar’s specimen, the Chemistry Department will be able to ‘discover’ it on Saiful’s underwear. Then they will be able to arrest and charge Anwar. And, who knows, they might even be able to convict him as well.
Yes, this Shafee Abdullah the sodomologist is good. He has names, charts, notes, scribbling and etchings all over his whiteboard in the meeting room of his law firm. This meeting room has been the special police operations centre for quite a while now. It was set up long before the alleged sodomy crime took place on 26 June 2008. It was set up not to solve the sodomy crime. It was set up to create the crime.
But, thus far, they lack one very crucial piece of evidence. They lack Anwar’s specimen that they need to plant on Saiful’s underwear. But they will get it as soon as the new DNA Act becomes law and they can use this law to force Anwar to hand over his specimen. Then Anwar is finished and they can close down the special police operations
So you mother fucker asshole Proate one
Fernando then took the court through the testimony of Raja Kamaruddin Raja Wahid, a.k.a Raja Komando, who had, in fine detail, revealed how the conspiracy against Anwar originally unfolded and the role he was given in this whole conspiracy.
THE CORRIDORS OF POWER
Raja
“Ummi Hafilda is a prostitute,” said Aziz Samsuddin
Day three of Anwar Ibrahim’s appeal hearing at the Kuala Lumpur Appeal Court hit a high note today when Christopher Fernando read out transcripts of the previous trial that quoted Aziz Samsuddin as saying Ummi Hafilda Ali is a prostitute.
Fernando started by recapping yesterday’s proceeding where he had told the court Ummi had been disowned by the father after she confessed to writing the letter to the Prime Minister, Dr Mahathir Mohamad, accusing Anwar of sodomising Azizan Abu Bakar, one-time driver of Anwar’s wife, Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail.
Ummi’s father, a religious teacher, just before he died, wrote an open letter to the Harakah detailing the reasons he had disowned her and, in no uncertain terms, implicated her as the prime mover behind Azizan.
“Ummi’s father died broken-hearted without ever forgiving his daughter for the role she played in framing Anwar of sodomy charges,” related Fernando.
Fernando had earlier read out Azmin Ali’s (Ummi’s brother) testimony in court that proved she played an active role in the whole conspiracy.
The prosecution never called her to testify in court to rebut this allegation, added Fernando. Instead they expected the defence to call her. The judge, in fact, even mentioned this point in his written judgment.
“But Ummi would have been a hostile witness so it should have been up to the prosecution and not the defence to call her,” argued Fernando.
Fernando said that the court should have invoked Section 114 (g) of the Evidence Act on the prosecution for failing to call a most crucial witness to testify in court.
Fernando then took the court through the testimony of Raja Kamaruddin Raja Wahid, a.k.a Raja Komando, who had, in fine detail, revealed how the conspiracy against Anwar originally unfolded and the role he was given in this whole conspiracy.
“The evidence of this witness will show he was invited to join the conspiracy with a view to topple the Deputy Prime Minister,” said Fernando.
“The meeting was held in the office of Aziz Samsuddin, the Prime Minister’s Political Secretary, on 26 June 1998.”
In the meeting, revealed Fernando, Aziz confirmed that Ummi and Azizan would pose no problem as “Ummi is a prostitute”.
Raja Komando then asked Aziz whether there was any other way to bring Anwar down.
According to Raja Komando, “Aziz replied sodomy would be the best way. Other ways would have no affect.”
“Raja Komando’s role was to manage the political assassination part of the exercise,” added Fernando. “The sodomy allegation was assigned to Ummi and Azizan.”
“Raja Komando was to disseminate the allegation as far and wide as possible. He was also to spread word that Anwar is a CIA agent.”
From what Fernando told the court today, it was clearly established in the meeting Raja Komando had with Aziz Samsuddin that he (Aziz) was the Chief Conspirator and that, while Ummi had written the purported “Azizan” letter to the Prime Minister accusing Anwar of sodomy, Aziz was the one who had edited and redrafted it.
The letter, Fernando said, was based on the book “50 Reasons Why Anwar Cannot be PM” - which somehow found its way into the attaché bags of almost 2,000 delegates at the Umno General Assembly that year.
“The judge did not give this evidence the weight it deserved,” argued Fernando. “He erred, grossly.”
“If he had given the evidence the weight it deserved, would he have arrived at the judgment he did?”
No comments:
Post a Comment