Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Mother fuckers mainstream media,enlarged assholed MUSA HASSAN .beer drinking Home Minister, master fabricaters THE A.G OFFICE,




[pic09464.jpg]






black eye1

readmore our tag line UMNO”S LIFELINE IS SAIFOOL’S ASSHOLE NO MORE KRIS WE HAVE ASSHOLE AS OUR DEFENCE


Musa and Gani Patail

readmoreMay be Inspector General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan was preparing his dossier rosmah& najib to renew his contract with the help of the carpetman


This is a silent revolt by the men in blue.



Malaysian EX -Minister of Health Dr Chua Soi Lek Sex Tape Download

Two DVDs showing Dr. Chua Soi Lek at the time a prominent senior politician, and a woman engaging in various sexual antics are being widely circulated in Tangkak, Batu Pahat and on the internet. Chua Soi Lek has admitted he’s the man in the video and resigned from his position as health minister. He identified the woman simply as “a personal friend.”

Dr Chua Soi Lek and woman getting ready for annal sex why was he not arrested for anal sex bloody barisan musa hassan


Ghost of ALTUNTANYA haunts the MUSA HASSAN the Mattress carrier CONVINCED THAT BODOWI De Facto recognition of ZIONIST STATE ISREAL
“in freedom we trust, in freedom we hope, in freedom we will be free……….eventually”
black eye1
[mob1900_sodomyII.jpg]
As a matter of national shame
A traitor is a traitor, with or without a uniform.


.

Raja Petra KamarudinThe following police report was made at 5.45 pm on Saturday, 28 June 2008,
by Mohd Saiful Bukhari Bin Azlan (IC no: 850706-01-5687), who turned 23 last
month:
Saya, Mohd Saiful Bukhari b Azlan, ingin melaporkan bahawa saya telah
diliwat oleh majikan saya. Perkara ini berlaku tanpa kerelaan saya. Kejadian
terakhir berlaku 26/6/08 di Unit 1151, Kondominium Desa Damansara, Jln Setia
Kasih, KL. Oleh itu, tujuan laporan ini dibuat untuk mendapat pembelaan dan
keadilan keatas diri saya. Saya juga berasa bimbang dengan keselamatan diri
dan keluarga saya jika perkara ini tersebar luas di khalayak ramai. Majikan
saya Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim – Ketua Umum PKR.
Yes, that police report was made at 5.45 pm on Saturday, 28 June 2008. By
why did it take that long for Saiful to make his police report? Let us
retrace the steps that led to this police report.

At 2.30pm on Wednesday, 25 June 2008, Saiful met Senior Assistant
Commissioner (SAC) II Mohd Rodwan Mohd Yusof in room 619 of the Concorde
Hotel in Kuala Lumpur. Prior to this secret meeting, Rodwan and Saiful spoke
on the phone at least eight (8) times.

In fact, they can’t really remember how many phone calls it was. They say it
was at least eight times although it could have been maybe ten or twelve
times. But who’s counting anyway? Eight, ten or twelve doesn’t really
matter. The crux of the matter is: they spoke over the phone many times
prior to meeting up in room 619 of the Concorde Hotel — a ‘secret’ meeting
that can’t be very secret if Malaysia Today knows about it.

We must remember one thing. Rodwan is the same police officer who was
involved in fabricating the 1998 sodomy allegation against Anwar. Rodwan was
implicated as the man who illegally took Anwar’s specimens, which
subsequently mysteriously reappeared as ‘stains’ on a mattress. It was so
apparent the mattress was planted as evidence the judge subsequently
rejected the mattress as evidence and ordered that all references of it be
expunged from the court records.

That was all it took. When they realised that the mattress was hurting more
than helping their case, they threw the mattress out of the court and
deleted all records of it ever appearing in court. And, all of a sudden, the
mattress no longer existed. It vanished into thin air. It ‘never appeared’
in court although for weeks it was paraded in and out of court for the whole
world to witness.

This is what lawyer and Parliamentarian Sivarasa Rasiah had to say about the
matter:

“In 1998-1999 trials, Anwar experienced the phenomenon of fabrication of DNA
evidence. We had SAC Rodwan illegally removing DNA samples from forensic
custody. In cross-examination of the prosecution’s witnesses it was exposed
that DNA taken from blood samples was planted on the infamous mattress.”

“When confronted with this fact the prosecution amended its charge and
persuaded the judge, Augustine Paul, to expunge the entire DNA evidence from
the record, preventing Anwar’s lawyers from responding.”

There were, in fact, other so-called ‘damaging evidence’ that they created
against Anwar to convince the public that he is indeed guilty of sodomy. In
time, Malaysia Today will parade these witnesses and reveal this evidence to
demonstrate to the public that the slime-ball IGP and scumbag AG, plus their
slithery minion, Rodwan, fixed Anwar’s ass good and proper (pun intended).

Now, Rodwan met Saiful three days earlier and these two exchanged at least
eight phone calls. Nevertheless, no police report was made until Saiful had
visited two hospitals — three days later. Why engage in eight phone calls
and have a secret meeting with Rodwan in a hotel room, and only after visits
to two hospitals does Saiful make his police report?

Let us look at the timeline again.

1) Saiful and Rodwan speak over the phone at least eight times over a few
days.
2) At 2.30pm on 25 June 2008, Saiful and Rodwan meet in room 619 of the
Concorde Hotel in Kuala Lumpur.
3) On 26 June 2008, Saiful’s ass allegedly gets ‘raped’ by Anwar.
4) At 2.00pm on 28 June 2008, Saiful goes to Pusat Rawatan Islam
(Pusrawi, a ‘halal’ hospital) to complain that he can’t ***. He tells the
doctor he can’t *** because someone buggered his *** — whereas that
would instead have made it easier for him to ***.
5) The doctor peeps into Saiful’s *** and discovers that his ***
is still as virgin as Raja Petra Kamarudin’s.
6) The doctor then suggests, for purposes of the police report, he goes
to a government hospital for a second opinion.
7) However, instead of getting a second opinion, Saiful goes to the
pondok polis at the hospital to lodge a police report. Sources in Hospital
Kuala Lumpur (HKL) say that no second medical examination was done whereas
the police say it was. Considering that the police report was made within an
hour or two after Saiful left the first hospital, it is highly likely the
hospital is telling the truth while the police are lying.

It must be noted that Saiful met the police BEFORE the so-called sodomy act
took place. The sodomy was supposed to have happened on 26 June while Saiful
met the police on 25 June. And it was not until 28 June that he went to
hospital and made the police report a couple of hours later. And all this
culminated not only after the secret meeting in the hotel room on 25 June
but after eight phone calls as well.

If Saiful was sodomised, would he not tell Rodwan about it during the secret
meeting in room 619 of the Concorde Hotel on 25 June 2008? And why in the
first place did they meet in secret in room 619 of the Concorde Hotel on 25
June 2008? Should they not be meeting in a police station or in the police
headquarters? And, most important of all, would you not want to meet the
police AFTER instead of before the so-called sodomy took place (never mind
whether the meeting is in secret in a hotel room or conducted the right way,
in a police station)?

Would anyone in his or her right mind believe this latest sodomy allegation?
Okay, I said ‘right mind’. Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi wants the
police to charge Anwar while the Cabinet is against it. The Cabinet feels
there is no evidence, not only to convict Anwar, but even to charge him in
the first place. But Abdullah wants the police to pursue the case and to
charge Anwar. As I said, no one in his right mind would believe the
allegation against Anwar but then Abdullah is not a person known to be in
his right mind.

And why does Abdullah want so much for the police to charge Anwar? Simple:
because his Deputy, Najib Tun Razak, would invariably get dragged into this
whole mess. The police have recorded both Najib’s and his wife’s statements
under Section 112. So that means Najib and Rosmah would both have to take
the witness stand to testify during the course of the trial. Once that
happens, everything will flow freely like *** through an *** that’s
been sodomised.

During the course of Anwar’s impending trial, Malaysians will be told of the
link Saiful has with Mumtaz Jaafar. Malaysians will also be told who Mumtaz
Jaafar is and what her ‘special’ links with Rosmah are. Further to that,
Malaysians will be told about the relationship between Najib’s Special
Officer, Khairul Anas, and Saiful — and the less than manly reputation
these two buggers had while still in school. Yes, the excitement and kinky
sex that is going to spill over from this trial will cause Astro to lose a
lot of business.

The Anwar sodomy trial will hurt Najib more than it will hurt Anwar. At the
end of the trial the court will declare that there is not enough evidence to
secure a conviction. It will be a long five or six years but eventually
Anwar will be free. However, during the course of the five- to six-year
trial, Anwar will have to sit in jail because he will be denied bail. Yes,
Anwar will be free in the end, but only after spending five to six years in
jail without bail.




The DVDs are believed to be closed-circuit television (CCTV) recordings in a hotel suite. However, the hotel’s location and the date of the recording are not known.


The first DVD lasting 56 minutes has footage of four different camera angles of the hotel suite – the bed, living area, entrance to the bathroom and the main door. It purportedly shows Dr Chua Soi Lekand woman entering the room separately.

The second DVD lasting 44 minutes is said to show the couple engaged in sex acts on the bed.


To many, it was unreal. Ten years ago, Anwar had faced a similar charge which saw him being jailed until the conviction and sentence were overturned on appeal in 2004.
In the latest episode, he was arrested on July 16 by balaclava-clad police – a scene reminiscent of that in 1998 – but freed a day later after being questioned and made to undergo a medical examination.
His supporters claimed that the government would detain him pending trial, ostensibly to prevent his campaigning for the Permatang Pauh by-election. But when Anwar claimed trial on Aug 7, he was freed on a RM20,000 personal bond.
Much else has happened outside the courtroom, including the allegation that Deputy Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak had a ‘hidden hand’ in the matter since he had met with Saiful prior to the complaint. Najib has denied this.
In 1997, Anwar wanted to go after a senior minister, who had been colluding with local authorities to alienate land in Johor, Kedah, Langkawi and Sepang. Of course TUN MAHATHIR won’t have this happen to the then UMNO treasurer. In the 90s, the ACA and the AG opined that there was a case against Rafidah over the allocation of shares to her son-in-law. TUN MAHATHIR stopped the proposed prosecution. In the late 90s, the Director-General of the EPU was “caught” with a rather large bundle of cash in his office drawer by the ACA. Again, TUN MAHATHIR said “no” to the proposed prosecution.What would be different if the MACC had been in place at those times ?
repeatedly accused the Attorney General’s office of bringing the charges against him as part of a political conspiracy falsification of evidence have been raised to the current affair by human rights organizations, which charge the trial is a bid to once again derail Anwar’s political career. Sodomy is a crime punishable by up to 20 years imprisonment and caning. Anwar led the Pakatan Rakyat opposition coalition to unprecedented political gains in March 2008 elections that broke the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition’s 50-year two thirds majority in the Malaysian parliament. In the 1999 case, the Committee on the Human Rights of Parliamentarians in Geneva, Switzerland, charged that “There are reportedly serious inconsistencies in the different testimonies given by the key witnesses. One of the senior police officers whom Mr. Ibrahim allegedly directed to have statements withdrawn, when called by the prosecution, produced a report he had written to Prime Minister Mahathir in 1997, stating that the sexual allegations were groundless and “deliberately created” as part of a conspiracy. In early January 1999, the government chemist who had conducted DNA tests of stains on a mattress conceded that the stains could have been planted by police and that the tests could not warrant a conviction, The senior lawyer from the Attorney General’s Chambers added that it had more such forensic and oral evidence to support the sodomy charge.The prosecution ultimately charged the opposition leader with consensual sex of a perverted nature rather than forcible sodomy, raising the question why Saiful hadn’t been charged as well.
Both government and private doctors filed reports saying they had found no evidence of forced penetration of the former aide, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, who was 23 at the time of the alleged offense. The prosecution, however, allege that they have additional evidence.In particular, Dr Mohamad Osman examined Saiful at Hospital Pusrawi Sdn Bhd in Kuala Lumpur on June 28 of 2008 after he had gone to the hospital to complain about pain he said he was suffering in his anus. He allegedly told hospital personnel he had been assaulted by a “very important person.” Osman filed a report saying he found no evidence of penetration or scarring that would have occurred from forcible entry. The physician suggested that the youth obtain another diagnosis at a government hospital, where doctors also refused to confirm a diagnosis of sodomy. Nonetheless, Saiful filed the assault report at a nearby police kiosk four hours later.
Session Court judge Komathy Suppiah will rule whether to hear the Sodomy II case or transfer it to the High Court as the prosecutors want.
There is no real issue here because a transfer is an established procedure and even if she refuses, which is really going against established norm, the government can always appeal her decision and probably have it reversed.
A higher court can reverse, her decision on appeal, if necessary, even on the same day.Anwar’s lawyers have argued that the transfer was signed by Attorney-General Ghani Patail whom Anwar is suing for fabricating evidence in the 1999 sodomy case which saw him imprisoned for six years for corruption.In 2000 Anwar was jailed an additional nine years for sodomy but the conviction was quashed in 2004 and he was freed after serving six years altogether. Meanwhile, the political ground is slipping under Anwar with the changes in Umno’s leadership and by extension that of the country.Abdullah had been kindest to Anwar among the top Umno leaders.Abdullah, who had also tried to use him to scare Umno into submission, is leaving for good having to make an announcement before Oct 9 whether he is offering himself to contest as Umno president. I was also Abdullah who Anwar had hoped to confound and stampede into handing over the government to him by triggering a mass exodus, a harebrained scheme that has since died under the weight of its own implausibility.
That small window for Anwar – Abdullah’s willingness to play by the rules, an inherent sense of justice and fair play – has closed with the PrimeMinister’simpendingdeparture



[dive1.jpg]







WHAT DID HE MEAN BY ‘TENTATIVE CHARGE BUT ALL IS NOT LOST’?
On 11th October, Malaysia Today carried a post entitled ‘Abuse of power by the Deputy Prime Minister’ that laid out a series of sms’es alleged to have passed between Najib and senior lawyer Shafee Abdullah in relation to Razak Baginda’s arrest and remand in the days before Baginda was charged.
Najib was publicly asked to comment about these sms’es and he never denied the authenticity of the same.
Now, there’s one other exchange of sms’es, this time allegedly between Razak Baginda and Najib. I do not recall Najib himself having ever addressed or denied or admitted the correctness or otherwise of these sms’es directly, as he did with the series of sms’es referred to in the MT posting.

I am referring to the 2 sms’es mentioned at paragraphs 51 and 52 of the first statutory declaration of private investigator Balasubramaniam. Let me reproduce below both paragraphs 51 and 52 of that first statutory declaration.

51. On the day Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested, I was with him at his lawyers office at 6.30am. Abdul Razak Baginda informed us that he had sent Najib Razak an SMS the evening before as he refused to believe he was to be arrested, but had not received a response.

52. Shortly thereafter, at about 7.30am, Abdul Razak Baginda received an SMS from Najib Razak and showed, this message to both myself and his lawyer. This message read as follows: “ I am seeing IGP at 11am today … matter will be solved … be cool”.

by Din Merican

Today the mainstream media reported that the friend of 15 year old Aminulrashid who was shot dead point blank by the Policegave a press conference. In that press conference, the surviving friend, Azamuddin Omar, gave his version of the shooting incident that totally contradicts the police’s version. If the police knew he would do this, he would have been hunted down and shot dead too! And what was the police version explained by IGP Musa Hassan?

According to IGP Musa, the dead boy tried to ram into the policemen, forcing the police to shoot. According to Musa, the boy is a criminal because a parang was found in the car, implying that the boy was a criminal, a fleeing felon who can be shot at will. According to Musa, a moving car is a dangerous weapon, obviously ignorant of the meaning of dangerous weapon/arm in the statute. According to Musa, he/the Police are telling the truth; there is no cover up and if the Malaysian public does not trust what he says, he will pull back the police from the streets and “confine to barracks”. Confine to barracks is a military term to indicate a boycott. That means Musa wants to boycott the public. That means Musa wants to boycott Malaysia, because under the Police Act and the Federal Constitution, it is the Police’s duty to maintain law and order in a civil times.

Let us pause for a moment. Let us analyse Musa’s words, can and should the Malaysian public trust Musa Hassan, the No.1 Policeman in the country?

Is this not the same man who climbed the ranks to become IGP after fixing up Anwar Ibrahim with his mattress carrying antics in Sodomy 1. Isn’t he the same Investigating officer who made up stories about the scene of the sodomy when the building was not even ready? Isn’t he also the one who worked hand in glove with the Along syndicate and released that criminal and twice RR detainee Goh Cheng Poh @ Tengku Goh while 6 of his officers and the Director of Commercial Crimes Dato’ Ramli Yusuff and his lawyer Rosli Dahlan got charged? Wasn’t he the one who worked with Dato Christopher Wan to create a fictitious blog to fix up Dato’ Johari Baharom. That blog is like the parang that the poice now planted in Aminulrasyid’s car. Bapa borek anak rintik.

Isn’t he the same IGP who appeared as the 75th Witness in Dato’ Ramli’s trial in Sabah who was denounced by Judge Supang Lian as ” an incredbible witness whose evidence is not to be believed”? That is legal phraseology to say Musa is a Liar!

Is that any surprise then that Razak Baginda go scot free while 2 rank and file officers get the hangman’s noose in the murder of Altantuya? Is there any surprise that Malaysians do not believe the police, the MACC, The AG, the judiciary and ultimately the Government? People like Musa Hassan, Gani Patail etc are cancerous cells, and more are growing to be like them because they are deemed successful for willing to do all the wrong and evil things. And we Malaysians are to be blamed for keeping mum!

Just look at the charade in Teoh Beng Hock’s Inquest. It is most revolting to see the lies and cover ups perpetrated by all these guardians of our public institutions. They have become so bold that they will even lie to us openly.Pak Lah, that supposedly religious ex Imam-PM even lied about the two oil wells he surrendered to Brunei and in return got nothing. He lied about getting sovereignty over Limbang. If an Imam-PM like Pak Lah can lie openly, what do we expect from PM Najib whose image is much improved now although he was implicated in the Altantuya Shariibu Murder?

I am expressing all these anger and disgust because I am just about to leave for the KL Criminal Sessions Court No.10, located at the left wing of the Jalan Duta Courts’ complex, where Judge Bakar Katar presides over the trial of Lawyer Rosli Dahlan. I have seen lies by the MACC Deputy Director of Prosecution Anthony Kevin Morais when he gave evidence previously. After 6 days, he is still on the stand. Today will be his 7th day. I expect to see and hear more lies spewing from his mouth when he is cross examined by Dato’ K Kumaraendran, Rosli Dahlan’s counsel.

I am revolted by all these lies. They do it in the newspapers, in Parliament and even in the courts while under oath. That Kevin Morais will lie in order to do in an innocent man like Rosli Dahlan has re-affirmed my resolve to expose all their lies. I will expose all these lies until we bring about genuine reforms!”


No comments: