President Obama Salaam Aleikum, Some Jews, however, took offense at the moral equivalence implied by Obama’s juxtaposition of the Holocaust with the suffering of Palestinians today
Posted by muslimmalaysia786 on June 7, 2009
Obama: Salaam Aleikum
By Joshua Kucera
President Obama spoke to the Muslim world in a heavily watched speech in Cairo, Egypt, and it leads almost all the papers. In the words of the Washington Post, it was “a direct appeal to the Islamic world Thursday for a ‘new beginning’ with the United States, acknowledging historical mistakes made over centuries in the name of culture and religion that he said are now overshadowed by shared interests.” The reviews were largely positive and acknowledged Obama’s ambition in giving the speech: The New York Times called the address a “bold overture” and “the riskiest of his presidency.” The Post said it “electrified many Muslims in the Arab Middle East,” and the Los Angeles Times called it “sweeping” and said it got “support from unexpected voices, such as members of the Hamas militant group in the Gaza Strip and Islamist intellectuals in Pakistan.” Only the Wall Street Journal seemed unimpressed, saying Obama “waded into the heart of the Middle East conflict” and “chided” Israel. USA Today fronts the speech but leads instead with advance word that a Federal Aviation Administration report will show that one in three U.S. airports has not taken legally mandated action to protect planes from birds.
Obama seemed to have the Cairo crowd at “hello”; his greeting of “Salaam aleikum” (literally peace be upon you) was greeted with applause and cheers by the audience at the university hall where the speech was delivered. The speech was widely praised by Muslims for its skillful use of Quran quotes, omission of the word “terrorist,” and acknowledgement of U.S. mistakes toward the Muslim world. The NYT goes so far as to say it was structured “almost like a Friday Prayer,” and the Post has good reporting on how Obama was able to achieve that level of facility with Muslim rhetorical practice, by meeting several times with American Muslim groups.
Some Jews, however, took offense at the moral equivalence implied by Obama’s juxtaposition of the Holocaust with the suffering of Palestinians today, a comparison one right-wing Israeli parliamentarian called “a shocking parallel,” according to the Post. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu issued a statement about the speech that the Journal called “restrained,” though the newspaper also quoted a left-wing Israeli arguing that “better Arab-American relations may actually prove very useful for Israeli national security.”
The speech was short on specifics, but the LAT, in an analysis by its Cairo bureau chief, says that is how it should be done: “[T]he speech was delivered the way you introduce yourself here to neighbors as a newcomer to town: explaining where you’re from, your passions, your dreams, but not delving too deeply into prickly things. That unveiling comes later, during ensuing weeks, months and years.” (Similarly, the same analysis suggests that the way Obama mentioned American mistakes, such as the Iraq war, also worked: “Saving face is a cherished Arab virtue, and a man who can keep face while listing his mistakes is respected.”)
The Post and NYT both run front-page stories on Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor’s past. The Times finds, by interviewing several people she worked with early in her career, that she rose through the ranks through her own merit and ambition and a few mentors rather than through the patronage of party or political bosses. And the Post analyzes several speeches, released by the White House yesterday, and notes repeated references to her Latina heritage, including several versions of the “wise Latina” line that has been the focal point of conservative opposition to her nomination. (The NYT stuffs a similar story.) The Journal, meanwhile, finds that if Sotomayor is confirmed, she appears likely to ally with the Supreme Court’s conservatives on criminal justice cases based on a review of some of her key rulings as a lower court judge.
The NYT, LAT, and Post front news that the Securities and Exchange Commission has accused the former CEO of Countrywide Financial, once the country’s biggest mortgage lender, of fraud and insider trading. The Times calls the case “the most prominent against an executive involved in the mortgage crisis.” The SEC released several e-mails implicating the CEO; in one, he writes of one of Countrywide’s offerings: “In all my years in the business I have never seen a more toxic product.”
Also in the news: The social pressure is now to show how frugal you are rather than to conspicuously consume, the Post says in a front-page recession trend story. The Post also fronts another episode in its ongoing investigation of Rep. John Murtha, the Pennsylvania Democrat accused of various forms of extreme pork-barrel politics; this time it’s allegations that a defense contractor with close ties to Murtha is using government money to pay for personal expenses. The NYT profiles a new charter school in New York that is paying teachers an unteacherly salary of $125,000 a year after assembling the “dream team” of accomplished educators found in a nationwide search. North Dakota is a rare bright spot in the nation’s economy, with state budget surpluses and the lowest unemployment rate in the United States, the Journal finds. The Journal also reports that China’s excess of young men is leading to a rise in marriage scams in which women demand a high bride price (the custom in rural China) and then run off with the money after the wedding. And the LAT has, in its Column One section, a good profile of a Colorado abortion doctor and friend of the slain George Tiller.
Obama: Salaam Aleikum
By Joshua Kucera
President Obama spoke to the Muslim world in a heavily watched speech in Cairo, Egypt, and it leads almost all the papers. In the words of the Washington Post, it was “a direct appeal to the Islamic world Thursday for a ‘new beginning’ with the United States, acknowledging historical mistakes made over centuries in the name of culture and religion that he said are now overshadowed by shared interests.” The reviews were largely positive and acknowledged Obama’s ambition in giving the speech: The New York Times called the address a “bold overture” and “the riskiest of his presidency.” The Post said it “electrified many Muslims in the Arab Middle East,” and the Los Angeles Times called it “sweeping” and said it got “support from unexpected voices, such as members of the Hamas militant group in the Gaza Strip and Islamist intellectuals in Pakistan.”
Only the Wall Street Journal seemed unimpressed, saying Obama “waded into the heart of the Middle East conflict” and “chided” Israel. USA Today fronts the speech but leads instead with advance word that a Federal Aviation Administration report will show that one in three U.S. airports has not taken legally mandated action to protect planes from birds.
Obama seemed to have the Cairo crowd at “hello”; his greeting of “Salaam aleikum” (literally peace be upon you) was greeted with applause and cheers by the audience at the university hall where the speech was delivered. The speech was widely praised by Muslims for its skillful use of Quran quotes, omission of the word “terrorist,” and acknowledgement of U.S. mistakes toward the Muslim world. The NYT goes so far as to say it was structured “almost like a Friday Prayer,” and the Post has good reporting on how Obama was able to achieve that level of facility with Muslim rhetorical practice, by meeting several times with American Muslim groups.
Some Jews, however, took offense at the moral equivalence implied by Obama’s juxtaposition of the Holocaust with the suffering of Palestinians today, a comparison one right-wing Israeli parliamentarian called “a shocking parallel,” according to the Post. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu issued a statement about the speech that the Journal called “restrained,” though the newspaper also quoted a left-wing Israeli arguing that “better Arab-American relations may actually prove very useful for Israeli national security.”
The speech was short on specifics, but the LAT, in an analysis by its Cairo bureau chief, says that is how it should be done: “[T]he speech was delivered the way you introduce yourself here to neighbors as a newcomer to town: explaining where you’re from, your passions, your dreams, but not delving too deeply into prickly things. That unveiling comes later, during ensuing weeks, months and years.” (Similarly, the same analysis suggests that the way Obama mentioned American mistakes, such as the Iraq war, also worked: “Saving face is a cherished Arab virtue, and a man who can keep face while listing his mistakes is respected.”)
The Post and NYT both run front-page stories on Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor’s past. The Times finds, by interviewing several people she worked with early in her career, that she rose through the ranks through her own merit and ambition and a few mentors rather than through the patronage of party or political bosses. And the Post analyzes several speeches, released by the White House yesterday, and notes repeated references to her Latina heritage, including several versions of the “wise Latina” line that has been the focal point of conservative opposition to her nomination. (The NYT stuffs a similar story.) The Journal, meanwhile, finds that if Sotomayor is confirmed, she appears likely to ally with the Supreme Court’s conservatives on criminal justice cases based on a review of some of her key rulings as a lower court judge.
The NYT, LAT, and Post front news that the Securities and Exchange Commission has accused the former CEO of Countrywide Financial, once the country’s biggest mortgage lender, of fraud and insider trading. The Times calls the case “the most prominent against an executive involved in the mortgage crisis.” The SEC released several e-mails implicating the CEO; in one, he writes of one of Countrywide’s offerings: “In all my years in the business I have never seen a more toxic product.”
April 1, 2010
Najib’s Freemason: APCO Malaysia mission an opportunistic Freemason infiltration which allows ZIONIST APCO to gain control imperceptibly,
Filed under: Uncategorized — fawas @ 5:46 pm
The Jewish Infiltration & Destruction of Mongolia
READMORE CLICK THIS
APCO Worldwide said: “In our work as communications consultants, we are not involved in policy formation but in the presentation of information the government intends to share with the public. We work for governments that are prepared to take our counsel on transparency, democracy and the rule of law. We are honoured to continue our work with the government of Malaysia.”
International communications consultancy APCO Worldwide today reiterated that it neither worked with the Israeli Government nor helped to create the 1Malaysia concept, as claimed by Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.
“The allegations repeated against APCO Worldwide this morning in the Malaysian Parliament are false. APCO Worldwide is not working for the government of Israel. We did not devise the 1Malaysia concept,” it said in a statement issued to Bernama here.
APCO Worldwide had also refuted on March 18 a similar allegation by Anwar.Today, in the Dewan Rakyat, Anwar called on the government to withdraw its contract with APCO Worldwide and set up a royal commission to inquire into the firm, alleging that it posed a risk to national security.
Anwar had raised the issue of APCO Worldwide when providing an explanation in the Dewan Rakyat following a suggestion by Datuk Abdul Rahman Dahlan (BN-Kota Belud) for him to be referred to the Rights and Privileges Committee for having alleged that the 1Malaysia concept had been copied from the “One Israel” slogan that he linked to APCO Worldwide.
Here we reach the more decisive point for our problem, the interpretation of which will nevertheless vary according to one’s ideas regarding the real influence of Judaism and its goals, if indeed one can speak at all of goals in the sense of a unitary international plan. To establish statistically what percentage of Jews there are in the ranks of Masonry, in this respect, is not important, because it is well-known that Jewish tactics, like those of any concealed power, are not to assert their presence by force of numbers, but rather through an opportunistic infiltration which allows them to gain control imperceptibly, from above and from behind the scenes, of all the vital organs of a given organisation : and a study along these lines, by the nature of things, is doomed to get bogged down in the imponderable. The convergence of Masonry and Judaism exhausts itself more or less on the plane of ‘elective affinities’, since the Jew spontaneously supports any liberal, democratic and internationalist idea, simply because owing to its condition no people has more to gain than his from the triumph of ideologies of that kind, and from the elimination of any hierarchical, authoritarian, national and traditional order. Besides, the age-old resentment of the Jew against Catholicism goes perfectly with the Masonic hatred against Rome and with the symbol of a temple which bears a Jewish name which, in the final analysis, has the signification of a rallying point for the forces of an international front hostile to supranational Catholic authority.
appear differently if one considers that the destructive influence exercised, either calculatedly or instinctively, in so many domains by many Jewish elements does not exhaust the true and secret goals, but, precisely according to the myth of the famous ‘Protocols’, is only preliminary to further enterprises perfectly known by the leaders of international Jewry – if those leaders exist – that is, immanent, so to speak, in the ’spirit’ of Israel. In fact, it is unnecessary to refer to the most controversial ‘Protocols’ : many positive declarations can arouse similar suspicions, and, for example, it may be enough to recall the words which Baruch Levi wrote to Karl Marx, which are not well-known and are worth quoting : “The Jewish people, as a whole, will be its own Messiah. Its domination on the world will be achieved by the union of the other human races, through the elimination of frontiers and of monarchies, which are the ramparts of particularism, and through the formation of a worldwide republic, in which the Jews will enjoy their rights everywhere. In this new organisation of humanity, the sons of Israel, who are now scattered throughout the world, will be able, without obstacles, to become everywhere the leading element, especially if they manage to place the working masses under the control of certain of their own number. The governments of the peoples constituting the worldwide republic, with the help of the proletariat, without this requiring any effort, will all fall into the hands of the Jews. Private property can then be subject to rulers of Jewish origin, who will control the state goods everywhere. Thus, the promise of the Talmud will be fulfilled, according to which Jews, when the time comes, will possess the keys of the wealth of all the peoples of the world
This ratio is absurd, there is no reason why the Mongolian Gov. (Which has been accused of corruption & rigging elections) has set the TugRug at such a low value. They only have themselves to blame for keeping people out of agricultural type expansion and military build-up.
Perhaps they are keeping it low so they can live high on hog in there own country with Millions of dollars a year for themselves from the United Nations?
Either way, this sets the stage for Racial disaster with a Tourist influx that is %40 from Israel?!?! (Which they have a visa-free agreement between)
Maybe this article can explain that percent of jewish tourists in the country? (NOT!): http://www.jewishsf.com/content/2-0-…playstory.html
Not only that, but “ westerners” (jews) have monopolized the corporate and also the private commercial business with 8 of THE best restaurants in Ulaanbaatar owned by jews WHO ARE ALL MARRIED TO MONGOLIAN WOMAN.
Any White Nationalist can see what is going on here, THE SAME THING THAT FIRST HAPPENED TO US. History (the jews) are repeating itself.
Only difference is, the damage is not completely done, they have a chance to awaken and destroy the jewish/khazar parasites before it’s too late. A night of broken glass is all it would take.
Some of you might wonder why China is not concerned about this jewish take over of Mongolia (or other Eastern countries for that matter)
The reason is because China is already controlled by jews since the Marxists took over and banished the Homogenous Monarchy. It is a combination of them thinking the jews will give them power/safety (I.E. US military arms & Intel from Israel) and them knowing that if they lay a finger on the jews there will be international backlash.
Perhaps they are keeping it low so they can live high on hog in there own country with Millions of dollars a year for themselves from the United Nations?
Either way, this sets the stage for Racial disaster with a Tourist influx that is %40 from Israel?!?! (Which they have a visa-free agreement between)
Maybe this article can explain that percent of jewish tourists in the country? (NOT!): http://www.jewishsf.com/content/2-0-…playstory.html
Not only that, but “ westerners” (jews) have monopolized the corporate and also the private commercial business with 8 of THE best restaurants in Ulaanbaatar owned by jews WHO ARE ALL MARRIED TO MONGOLIAN WOMAN.
Any White Nationalist can see what is going on here, THE SAME THING THAT FIRST HAPPENED TO US. History (the jews) are repeating itself.
Only difference is, the damage is not completely done, they have a chance to awaken and destroy the jewish/khazar parasites before it’s too late. A night of broken glass is all it would take.
Some of you might wonder why China is not concerned about this jewish take over of Mongolia (or other Eastern countries for that matter)
The reason is because China is already controlled by jews since the Marxists took over and banished the Homogenous Monarchy. It is a combination of them thinking the jews will give them power/safety (I.E. US military arms & Intel from Israel) and them knowing that if they lay a finger on the jews there will be international backlash.
This is why China has a community of 10,000+ jews that are allowed to operate above ground in their own synagogues while Christians get shot and are still hiding in caves and basements.
But this is not just restricted to Mongolia either, I could have made the same article about other underdeveloped Eastern countries such as Thailand, Taiwan, the Philippines’, ect… this systematic jewish destruction is not limited to Mongolia, but it is the most apparent because it is in it’s first stages there.
Jesus said, the Jews are liars, hypocrites, and deceivers. They twist the truth to their benefit and give us lies.
Once again I have the pleasure to bring you an article written by a dear friend of mine. This article as many of mine fives a view into the terrible forces of the Jews. Read it and learn from it.
Jewish infiltration in Great Britain! By Christian Borleis
The onslaught of Jewish infiltration took place much earlier in England
than in Germany. Oliver Cromwell was short of cash and relayed on the Dutch financiers to support him in his ambitions to oust King Richard. The
Bloodline had become increasingly keen in demolishing monarchies in favour of democracies, in which they could hold easier access to power. Ever since Oliver Cromwell in 1657 let the Jews Manasseh Ben Israel and Moses Carvajal finance his war on King Charles I the Jews gained power over the political life in England. When later, in 1689, Amsterdam Jews financed a rebellion against King James II they enlarged their power. The chief of those Amsterdam Jews, Solomon Medina, followed William of Orange to England. In 1694 the Jews set up the Bank of England. They gained power over all taxes, they actually also gained power over all of England.
After the Jews had set foot in England they started to misuse that power by
forbidding any ships but English to transport goods from English colonies
to England and vise versa. This was partly done by letting English ships
act as pirates attacking ships at high sea. The law, which was introduced
and approved by parliament, was called “The Naval Act.” They conducted the entirely slave trade form the African continent to the Americas.
In England it was possible to purchase an inheritable lordship (Lord
Rothschild, Lord Cherwell, etc.) By becoming member of the hierarchy it
opened the door to influence and prestige. England became under the spell
of Jewish influence corrupt (Yiddishized) and lost its integrity.
Also in the news: The social pressure is now to show how frugal you are rather than to conspicuously consume, the Post says in a front-page recession trend story. The Post also fronts another episode in its ongoing investigation of Rep. John Murtha, the Pennsylvania Democrat accused of various forms of extreme pork-barrel politics; this time it’s allegations that a defense contractor with close ties to Murtha is using government money to pay for personal expenses. The NYT profiles a new charter school in New York that is paying teachers an unteacherly salary of $125,000 a year after assembling the “dream team” of accomplished educators found in a nationwide search. North Dakota is a rare bright spot in the nation’s economy, with state budget surpluses and the lowest unemployment rate in the United States, the Journal finds. The Journal also reports that China’s excess of young men is leading to a rise in marriage scams in which women demand a high bride price (the custom in rural China) and then run off with the money after the wedding. And the LAT has, in its Column One section, a good profile of a Colorado abortion doctor and friend of the slain George Tiller.
No comments:
Post a Comment