MCA or Malaysian Corrupted Agency +DAIM, SYED MOKHTAR JOIN MCA (DELEGATION)

MCA has admitted it has RM2 billion in assets without being able to account for it and show where the money came from. The MCA President flew in Tiong’s private jet without paying while he is supposed to be investigating Tiong’s misconduct involving RM12.5 billion of the rakyat’s money. Tiong also gave the MCA President RM10 million in cash, which MCA says does not reflect in the party’s accounts book. Yet the MACC is still sleeping. Or are they actually sucking the dick of those who walk in the corridors of power

The greatest challenge faced by MCA does not come from DAP or Keadilan, but UMNO. The space for the party’s survival doesn’t come from the decisions made by the voters, but the bosom and vision of UMNO.

Recently, a “sensitive” opinion poll was going on in the MCA president’s blog. The question was: Should MCA pull out from Barisan National?

In my opinion, we do not need to overinterpret this matter; neither does it hint that Ong Tee Keat really harbours such an intention. However, other people, including those in UMNO, may not think the same. At least it will trigger a great deal of conjectures.

No matter what, Najib has said it was just an academic research, and he did not think MCA would actually withdraw from BN.

In this matter, UMNO seems to be full of confidence, knowing that MCA would not fly away even if it has been endowed with a pair of wings. As for MCA, the party is much accustomed to its old nest, and we are not sure whether it can really fly away even with those wings!

Having said that, as an academic research, the outcome of this poll still warrants some serious studies. From the 2,500 replies received, some 75% of respondents think MCA should quit BN.

I don’t know the backgrounds of these respondents, but based on common sense, visitors to the MCA president’s blog should be predominantly MCA members or supporters.

So, when even MCA’s supporters feel that the party should pull out, the direction is clear enough: there is really problem with BN!

MCA leaders often find it tough to defend even many of BN government’s policies.

The unequal relationship between UMNO and MCA makes it very hard for MCA leaders to explain to the public.

Although a new president is now taking charge in UMNO, and a new president has also been elected for MCA, we still don’t see major changes in the existing policies, and the old relationship remains much the same.

With BN and UMNO still clinging on to their old self, MCA’s crisis could only get further entrenched.

MCA lost a big chunk of its parliamentary seats in the general elections last March. How well can its existing 15 seats withstand the impact of the next general elections remains unknown.

The greatest challenge faced by MCA does not come from DAP or Keadilan, but UMNO. The space for the party’s survival doesn’t come from the decisions made by the voters, but the bosom and vision of UMNO.

If UMNO does possess any respectable measure of political wisdom, it should be well aware that a frail MCA is not going to augur well for UMNO or BN.

Now that Najib has admitted that MCA is a senior partner in BN, he should allow MCA to play a more important role within the ruling coalition.

MCA, meanwhile, must also harness its “senior partner” status and exert its full potentials.

For instance, when UMNO and PAS are trying to woo each other into a unity government, MCA should be the first to jump out and declare: “I am a senior partner in Barisan Nasional. You need to get my permission first. Such a unity government will only disrupt the nature of BN, and if you insist to go ahead with it, MCA will pull out from BN as a protest.”Senior partner, yes , in the sense of a weak, crippled partner! When you dare not make a principled stand on matters that affect the welfare of the community you are supposed to represent , how do you expect the rakyat to respect you. What has the MCA achieved over the years except to beg for handouts from the UMNOputras , rather than fight for our rights? MCA KNOWS THAT UMNO/BN WILL LOSE NEXT GE AND THEY DEFINITELY WONT BE ACCEPTED BY PR. NO CHOICE BUT GOING SOLO. AT LEAST THEY WOULD HAVE A BIT OF SENSE THAN HADI’S PAS.I don’t think MCA has the ability to ‘fly away’. That’s because it is an OSTRICH, if you really need to classify it as a bird. It’s wings are not capable of flying, and it has this habit of burying its head into the sand the moment it senses problems/trouble, and then just pretends it does not see anything, so that problem will eventually go away. A really ostrich, if you ask me.

MCA why pull out now Didnt you hear about the “Unity Government” thing Why you dont think it will work huh Go figure that out if MCA will be part of the “UNITY GOVERNMENT”.. So much for you “Senior partner” status in BN.as they say in GOOD malaysian English. “MCA dont be shy shy lah” Come talk to come talk to PR and see if they can give you Senior partner status. Your trick already being used lah. Koh Sok Koon beat you to it already. Gerakan already use that trick ,,pretend to pul out and the get a Post as prefect for PKI. Now he happy so no more talk of pulling out. How can MCA jumps when they got no legs ?it is time that you change or the Chinese will change you in the next election but before you leap you should write the SD first to let the Chinese know where you stand.It is of no point if you just said without doing.What happen if you change your mind after the next election and join back the BeEnd ? We are not a fool anymore.Think of it.It is better that you dissolvec the party and join any PR party that is the best way as the raykat will never put the trust on you to Make Chinese Angry.(MCA) MCA is nothing but a parasite leaching on the BN banner so that it can suck out fianacial benefits for their own private gains. Their corrupt behaviour has not gone unnoticed. MCA do nothing for the wider community except that if it will line their pockets with cash and more cash.This Ong Talk Kock have not made his money yet through UMNO ………. like that corrupted pig faced carTUN Ling Leong Sick who sells out his party members behind closed doors !MCA reached its end of relevance, think all decent upstanding citizens – malays, chinese, indians, should ensure that a blood-sucking political party like MCA never ever controls or influences (with their self-interests behavior) our quality-of-life again. (those who tacitly or implicity support filth and evil are equally accountable If the whole think can make it to the maintreams media…Then it’s farking hoax. Remember…MCA stands for Malaysia Castrated Association. Quit and rejoin back also can mah….OTK would ask DAP about the quality of the odours each time Hadi burps or Nash self deflates through his bottoms while looking up to UMNOBARU for a pet on his flat head. This time his blog is used to cover his own embarassments for being so vile to the consistant DAP who never said they represented the Malaysian Chinese. MCA have always claim to represent (themselves)the Chinese ! Being just promoted to the position of ’senior partner’when since 1969 have always remain at the base of the UMNO/UMNOBARU’s soles. And to rub salt into MCA’ sored butts,UMNOBARU is now lifting up a little bit of its sarong to entice PASHADI while PASNIK remains a steadfast entity after being bittened by a mamba in batik skin. PASHADI should beware should it venture its groping fingers to the upper reaches of the sarong of the treacherous UMNOBARU. Anyway, MCA is feeling being ignored completely this time around for PM’s roving eyes are strained at MekPASHADI. How can OTK continue to be the no.1 bedpartner of UMNOBARU after all those dramas done to vilify Karpal , especially ! OTK , stop swallowing dead cats for your predecessors. You are choking blue !!!!If you are clean, you have no fear.Karpal should save some compassion for you !!! Bring all your untainted followers over if there is any left standing !If Hadi and Najib shakes hands one day to unite, OTK probably would hail PAS as an additional strength to BN. Such is the spineless party we have today that claims they represents the Chinese in Malaysia. Whatever it is, people in BN doesn’t realize that they are now dinosaurs. Their time is up and majority of Malaysians are prepared to chuck away race based politics. Majority of Malaysians are looking forward to a two party systems and Pakatan will be the next government of Malaysia. MCA going solo? What a joke! With UMNO’s underwear covering its head, How would the MCA see the way ahead!

Another round of squeezing the rakyat…Have Daim and Moktar lost much in this global crash…looks like it..and the vultures are out again to see if there is another way to bail themselves out…curi from the rakyat under the pretense of big business..this time Mahathir is not around to bail out. He cannot steal from Petronas, EPF, Socso, Tabung Haji….Bank Negara…Bankrupt Bank Bumiputra.. Bloody big time thievesYes as a Chinese, I will vote in PAS anytime, anywhere in this country, because with the Pakatan Rakyat I can rest assured that the law as spelled out in our constitution will reign supreme, and pretenders like PAS will be stopped right in their tracks by the DAP unlike the shenanigans at the MIC and MCA who have now brought minorities to their knees by deceiving them of their rights by colluding with UMNO.It was the British spy; Harold Philby who once said that “To betray you must first belong.” By belonging, the MCA, MIC and Gerakan have never hesitated for a minute to make full use of their belonging to betray and condemn their communities to a bleak and uncertain future.

DAIM, SYED MOKHTAR JOIN MCA (DELEGATION)

What the hell is going on. Political visit includes business tycoons. OTK is a disgrace. What is your actual agenda for such a visit. You have to explain to the rakyat the reasons. Your trip is paid by the people. What justification is there for you top go. You cannot even rally the Chinese support in the recent KT election. YB LGE is better than you. You are in his pocket. Dare debate on Chinese affairs with YB LGE?why is that “crook” Daim still around. After he had “cleared” our nation coffer high and dry, yet BN/MCA is opening the door for him.

DID YOU ASK ALL THE (DELEGATION) TO STATE THEIR STAND ON HUDUD.TO YOU

YOU CANNOT WORK WITH HUDUD YOU MUST TELL THE CHINESE THAT WHAT THEY HAD

STATED ABOUT HUDUD.Thick PIG HEAD, go to China and tell the Chinese people how you turn Malaysian Chinese into running dogs for UMNO , and tell them how you threatened the KT Chinese folks ABOUT HUDUD if they refuse to vote for MCA!I see they brought the Health Minister along too!…Safety precaution?TO STUDY AND ASK THE CHINESE MUSLIMS TO STAND THEIR STAND ON HUDUD.AND GET HIS QUE NO. FOR THE FIRING SQUAD.

DID YOU ASK DIAM HOW THE PRIME LANDS OWNED BY KTM ENDED WITH MRRCB AND YTL.

This confidence far outstrips the current and ongoing blatant sell out of their communities by the MIC and MCA to UMNO, not that race based politics matter anymore.

Raja Petra Kamarudin

The MCA treasurer, Tan Sri Tee Hock Seng says, MCA has assets of RM2 billion. How did a political party amass such wealth? Did the office bearers of this political party use their public offices as Ministers, etc., to procure personal and political donations?

The Kuala Dimensi CEO, Datuk Seri Tiong King Sing, has accused the MCA President, Ong Tee Keat, of using his company’s private jet without paying and of receiving RM10 million in cash as a donation. Ong has admitted to the use of the jet but is now prepared to pay for it. Similar donations were also given to MCA Wanita Chief Datin Paduka Chew Mei Fun. Chew has not denied the donation but said it went to the party and not to her personally. These are admissions of “corrupt gratification” as defined in MACCA.

According to the MACCA, all the above are criminal acts and these people should be hauled in and charged. After all, they have not denied the act and have actually admitted to the allegations.

To assist the MACC, Malaysia Today is going to do some community service by helping the MACC with a short law lecture, which we will call ‘MACCA for MACC idiots’.

1.2 Corrupt Gratification

1.2.1 S. 3 Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009 (Act 694) (“MACCA”) :

“‘gratification’ means-

(a) money, donation, gift, loan, fee, reward, valuable security, property or interest in property being property of any description whether movable or immovable, financial benefit, or any other similar advantage;

(b) any office, dignity, employment, contract of employment or services, and agreement to give employment or render services in any capacity;

(c) any payment, release, discharge or liquidation of any loan, obligation or other liability, whether in whole or in part;

(d) any valuable consideration of any kind, any discount, commission, rebate, bonus, deduction or percentage;

(e) any forbearance to demand any money or money’s worth or valuable thing;

(f) any other service or favour of any description, including protection from any penalty or disability incurred or apprehended or from any action or proceedings of a disciplinary, civil or criminal nature, whether or not already instituted, and including the exercise or the forbearance from the exercise of any right or any official power or duty; and

(g) any offer, undertaking or promise, whether conditional or unconditional, of any gratification within the meaning of any of the preceding paragraphs (a) to (f);”.

1.2.2 The MCA Ministers are clearly officers of a public body under s.3 MACCA:

“‘officer of a public body’ means any person who is a member, an officer, an employee or a servant of a public body, and includes a member of the administration, a member of Parliament, a member of a state Legislative Assembly, a judge of the High court, court of Appeal or Federal court, and any person receiving any remuneration from public funds, and, where the public body is a corporation sole, includes the person who is incorporated as such.”

1.2.3 ‘Public body’ includes -

(a) the Government of Malaysia;

(b) the Government of a state;

(c) any local authority and any other statutory authority;

(d) any department, service or undertaking of the Government of Malaysia, the Government of a state, or a local authority;

(e) any society registered under subsection 7(1) of the societies Act 1966 [Act 335];

(f) any branch of a registered society established under section 12 of the societies Act 1966;

(g) any sports body registered under section 17 of the sports Development Act 1997 [Act 576];

(h) any co-operative society registered under section 7 of the co-operative societies Act 1993 [Act 502];

(i) any trade union registered under section 12 of the Trade Unions Act 1959 [Act 262];

(j) any youth society registered under section 9 of the Youth societies and Youth Development Act 2007 [Act 668];

(k) any company or subsidiary company over which or in which any public body as is referred to in paragraph (a),(b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i) or (j) has controlling power or interest; or

(l) any society, union, organization or body as the Minister may prescribe from time to time by order published in the Gazette.”

1.2.4 s. 16 MACCA – Corrupt gratification is an offence whether it is for herself or for anyone else (the party). In case Datin Paduka Chew argues the offence refers to “him”, yes in today’s environment, the nyonya is also as rotten as the apek:

“Any person who by himself, or by or in conjunction with any other person-

(a) corruptly solicits or receives or agrees to receive for himself or for any other person; or

(b) corruptly gives, promises or offers to any person whether for the benefit of that person or of another person,

any gratification as an inducement to or a reward for, or otherwise on account of-

(A) any person doing or forbearing to do anything in respect of any matter or transaction, actual or proposed or likely to take place; or

(B) any officer of a public body doing or forbearing to do anything in respect of any matter or transaction, actual or proposed or likely to take place, in which the public body is concerned,

commits an offence.”

1.2.5 See also s. 21 – bribery of officer of a public body; and s. 23 – bribery of member of state administration or legislature. MCA Ministers are both officer of public body as well as members of the administration.

1.2.6 In Public Prosecutor v. Datuk Haji Harun bin Haji Idris (No 2) [1977] 1 MLJ 15, Raja Azlan Shah FJ held:

“Corrupt” means “doing an act knowing that the act done is wrong, doing so with evil feelings and evil intentions.” (see Lim Kheng Kooi v. Reg ; [1957] MLJ 199 . “purposely doing an act which the law forbids” (see R v. Smith ) [1960] 1 All ER 256.

“Corrupt” is a question of intention. If the circumstances show that what a person has done or has omitted to do was moved by an evil intention or a guilty mind, then he is liable under the section. Thus if the accused used his position to solicit gratification with a guilty mind, he is caught within the ambit of the section. The real point is whether there is soliciting a political donation with a corrupt intention.” (emphasis added)

1.2.7 If the MCA coffers of RM 2 billion are acquired by the MCA Ministers using their government positions to secure all kinds of donations and assets, then they would have offended s. 21 MACCA:

“Any person who offers to an officer of any public body, or being an officer of any public body solicits or accepts, any gratification as an inducement or a reward for-

(a) the officer voting or abstaining from voting at any meeting of the public body in favour of or against any measure, resolution or question submitted to the public body;

(b) the officer performing or abstaining from performing or aiding in procuring, expediting, delaying, hindering or preventing the performance of, any official act;

(c) the officer aiding in procuring or preventing the passing of any vote or the granting of any contract or advantage in favour of any person; or

(d) the officer showing or forbearing to show any favour or disfavour in his capacity as such officer,

commits an offence, notwithstanding that the officer did not have the power, right or opportunity so to do, show or forbear, or accepted the gratification without intending so to do, show or forbear, or did not in fact so do, show or forbear, or that the inducement or reward was not in relation to the affairs of the public body.”

1.2.8 It is also an offence under s. 21 MACCA for an officer of a public body:

(a) to vote or abstain from voting at any meeting of the public body or

(b) to perform or abstain from performing any official act;

(c) to procure or prevent the passing of any vote or the granting of any contract or advantage in favour of any person; or

(d) to show or forbear to show any favour or disfavour.

1.2.9 Since Chew Mei Fun had admitted to receiving the donation/gratification on behalf of MCA, there is a presumption under s. 50 MACCA that it was corruptly received:

“Where in any proceedings against any person for an offence under section 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22 or 23 it is proved that any gratification has been received or agreed to be received, accepted or agreed to be accepted, obtained or attempted to be obtained, solicited, given or agreed to be given, promised, or offered, by or to the accused, the gratification shall be presumed to have been corruptly received or agreed to be received, accepted or agreed to be accepted, obtained or attempted to be obtained, solicited, given or agreed to be given, promised, or offered as an inducement or a reward for or on account of the matters set out in the particulars of the offence, unless the contrary is proved.”

Leave a Comment