Sunday, May 18, 2014

Is Dyana Sofya the DAP's cultural revenge against Gerakan and MCA ?



By placing issues related to equity and discrimination at the heart of its professed concerns, an entire political industry that thrives on creating pockets of influence based on patronage has been created. The political establishment is transparently self-serving while apparently looking after the interests of the marginalised. Imported idealism becomes a vehicle for local cynicism; the result is a political system that mouths platitudes while serving itself. To the cultural mainstream, the Nehru-Gandhi family has become a symbol of this political culture of creating differences and then feeding them opportunistically so as extract power for itself.
Democracy will again, this time speak with a new accent. If in its early days, democracy in Malaysia principally represented the views of the liberal educated elite, and in the post-Mahatir era, opened up its portals to a completely new, hitherto under-represented class, in the coming of  in 2014, what we see is the triumphant emergence of yet another class, that so far lay largely unnoticed in the folds of the Great Malaysia Middle Class. While Dyana Sofya ’s appeal has clearly transcended traditional electoral segments arrayed along the lines of race and class, her core support base comes from a class that has been described as the urban non-English speaking aspiration-seeking section of society that is impatient to move on in life.To those outside this definition, the liberal worldview stands for a particular form of self-loathing that springs from a desire to challenge and even dismantle what are seen to be the ‘natural’ building blocks of identity — gender, class, race, region and religion. Each of these sources of identity is subject to rigorous examination, and its naturalness distrusted. The focus is on differences and the attempt is to erase these so as to level the playing field. Liberal concerns tend to flow margin-inwards- how are minorities treated, how does one address discrimination by gender, caste and sexual orientation and so on. Issues of equity, justice and discrimination take precedence over others.


Using this framework, the liberal worldview has rendered the cultural mainstream not only deeply uncomfortable but virtually illegitimate. Every natural instinct of this class is subject to being labelled regressive, communal or chauvinistic. The liberal viewpoint accords to itself an implicit moral superiority which it then deployed to pass judgement on the world around it. The liberal hunt for injustice and discrimination is relentless and unsparing, even of itself and this creates an atmosphere of deep discontent given the fact that injustice and discrimination abound in the country. The standards employed are rigorous, even world class and span areas like the environment, sexual orientation, laws of all kinds, affirmative action based on caste, gender injustice, among others. For the cultural mainstream, these issues are seen as marginal, a culturally alien device that the liberal worldview uses to beat them into moral submission.The politics spawned by Nehruvian liberalism has evoked a simmering sense of rage. For some time now, the self-described cultural mainstream has been seething at what they see as the contemptuous rejection of their way of life and their ideals by a group that deals in ideas that have no natural cultural resonance with the Indian reality. The fault line is essentially a cultural one — democracy has been seen as a vehicle that has served to impose a new set of ideals with an alien vocabulary on a passive majority.
The implicit mental model that is imagined in the new Malaysia promised by DAP is one of benign majoritarianism, where the majoritarian is imagined not merely in terms of religion but in all aspects of reality as it exists. It is an emphatic vote for maintaining the essential structure of reality as it exists and providing propulsion from that starting point rather than focus on differences at the margin. The nation as a formulation — the notion of ‘Malays First’ is shorthand for existing reality with its structure and way of life intact. In truth,  promises progress much more than change, although that may not be immediately apparent. The constituency he represents is comfortable with social continuity and what it sees as organic evolutionary change. The right-wing fringe might think differently, but the core Modi supporter usually has no problem with social evolution and change as long as it is not structurally disruptive.

It is easy to think of the new regime in terms of Dyana Sofya's persona but as powerful a figure as she is in today’s political reality, she represents a more fundamental change.  Dyana Sofya' has unified the cultural mainstream of Malaysia electorally. It is as ifMalaysia is beginning again, this time driven by ideals of the dominant cultural mainstream. Potentially, this changes everything, and causes hope and dread of equal intensity. At this time, without question it is hope that dominates for that is the sentiment of the majority. Of course, the majority never sees itself as merely that, it always equates itself with the whole and accords to itself an air of engaging reasonableness. Armed with that self-belief, it usually has little interest in carping voices of dissent or of issues of those at the margin. Perhaps better days do lie ahead, as the Dyana Sofya campaign promises, but whether that includes everyone is something that time will tell.

Considering the outright rejection of  Gerakan and MCA  across Malaysia The UMNO had to battle anti-incumbency both at the Centre and state DAP will .turn  this election into a referendum on the performance of Najib governmen  the anti-corporate, neo-Left, feminist litterateur and culturally sensitive to large number of first-time, young voters have not changed the entrenched political equations in the state, at least for now. The dance of democracy ballooned into a rave party Having been wooed so long by the grandees and their rag-tag armies, been promised the sun and the moon by the stars, we must reconcile ourselves to our eclipsed existence. Go back to being tax-payer , skydiver , college bunker; the butcher,  . Do we greet the end of the polling season with relief that the noise has ended, excitement over the change to come, or simply, trepidation over the emptiness now stretching before us?
The Teluk Intan by-election will see a straight fight between DAP political greenhorn Dyana Sofya Mohd Daud and Gerakan president Datuk Mah Siew Keong. – The Malaysian Insider pic, May 19, 2014.

Politician Mah Siew Keong, the current Gerakan president, who previously held the seat between 1999 to 2008 and is a local boy who is well known in the constituency.
Mah lost the last two general elections here to DAP's M Manogaran in 2008 and to the late Seah in May last year, the latest by a majority of more than 7,000 votes 
But the 53-year-old  will count on his experience and the strength of the BN machinery for the 12-day campaign period before Teluk Intan goes to polls on May 31.

Some independent candidates are also expected to enter the fray, though none have explicitly stated their intent in doing so.
 he 53-year-old Mah (pic, right) graduated from the London School of Economics and has a law degree from the University of East London, while the 27-year-old lawyer Dyana is the political secretary to Lim Kit Siang and will be the party’s first Malay DAP woman MP if elected.
The seat has 23,301 Malay voters (38.6%), 25,310 Chinese voters (41.9%) and 11,468 Indian voters A total of 60,349 registered voters consisting of 59,927 ordinary voters, 410 early voters and 12 overseas absentee voters are eligible to vote in the by-election.


No comments: